Singh v. Chertoff et al
Satnam Singh |
Michael Chertoff, Condoleeza Rice, Jonathan Scharfen, Christina Poulos and Susan M. Curda |
2:2008cv02366 |
October 6, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Other Immigration Actions Office |
Sacramento |
Edmund F. Brennan |
Frank C. Damrell |
Other Immigration Actions |
U.S. Government Defendant |
28:1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/11/2010 RECOMMENDING that respondents' 18 motion to dismiss be granted; this case be dismissed w/out prejudice; and the clerk be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections due w/in 14 days. (Yin, K) |
Filing 17 ORDER re 16 Stipulation filed by Michael Chertoff, Condoleeza Rice, Christina Poulos, Susan M. Curda, and Jonathan Scharfen, signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr., on 10/8/09. Dfts' Answer is DUE on 12/15/09.(Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 15 FOURTH JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 8/14/09: Pursuant to this Joint Stipulation and for the reasons stated therein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants' Answer is due on October 15, 2009. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 13 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 4/8/09 re 12 ORDERING that the defendants' answer is due on August 15, 2009. (Duong, D) Modified on 4/10/2009 (Duong, D). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.