Fowlie v. Sisto
| Brian Fowlie |
| D. K. Sisto |
| 2:2008cv02744 |
| November 14, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/19/11 ORDERING the findings and recommendations are adopted in full; this action is dismissed without prejudice; and the court declines to issue the certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
26
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/20/11 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice; 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/08/11 vacating 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Within 14 days of the date of this order, petitioner shall show cause why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to file a notice of change of address. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
22
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/04/11 recommending that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 02/03/09 ordering plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis 5 is granted. Respondents are directed to file a response to petitioner's habeas petition within 60 days from the d ate of this order. The clerk of the court shall serve a copy of this order, the consent/reassignment form together with a copy of the petition for writ of habeas corpus on Michael Patrick Farrell, Senior Assistant Attorney General. Within 20 days of the date of this order, the parties shall show cause why this action should not be administratively stayed pending the Ninth Circuit's decision in Hayward v. Marshall. (cc: Michael Farrell)(Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fowlie v. Sisto | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Brian Fowlie | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: D. K. Sisto | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
