League to Save Lake Tahoe, et al. v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency
| League to Save Lake Tahoe and Sierra Club |
| Tahoe Regional Planning Agency |
| 2:2008cv02828 |
| November 21, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Placer |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Environmental Matters |
| 30 U.S.C. ยง 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/30/2012 DECLINING to relate cases as noticed in 138 Notice of Related Case. (Michel, G)
|
|
Filing
129
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/23/2010 DENYING 121 Defendants Rule 59(e) Motion. (Donati, J)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/16/10. ORDERING plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment 87 is GRANTED and defendants' cross motion for summary judgment 98 is DENIED. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Ordinance number 2008 - 10, adopted 10/22/08, the Shorezone Amendments adopted at that time, the certification of the Environmental Impact Statement, and all findings based thereon are VACATED. The matter is REMANDED to defendant Tahoe Regional Planning Agency for further proceedings consistent with this order.The clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. CASE CLOSED. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
107
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 05/27/10 ORDERING that TRPA shall have until 06/11/10 to file its Reply Brief in support of its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
93
ORDER re 92 Stipulation Modifying Briefing Schedule, signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/22/2010. Dft TRPA shall file its opposition brief to pltf League's Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, if any, BY March 1, 2010. Intervenor Association and Amicus California State Lands Commission shall file their briefs BY March 26, 2010. Pltf League shall file its reply brief BY May 4, 2010. TRPA shall file its reply brief, if TRPA elects to file a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment, BY June 4, 2010.(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/28/10 ORDERING that plaintiffs file a statement of undisputed facts within 7 days of the date of this order. No sanctions are required, however, plaintiffs are cautioned to observe local rules in further filings. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
89
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/22/2010 ORDERING 86 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency DISMISSED from this action, pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). All parties to bear their own attorneys' fees and costs. The Parties shall meet and confer over any modifications to the Court's 11/18/2009 briefing schedule. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/18/09 re 83 ORDERING that Plaintiffs shall file their briefs concerning summary judgment on or before January 21, 2010. Defendant shall file its oppositions to Plai ntiffs' motions for summary judgment on or before February 22, 2010. Environmental Plaintiffs shall file their memorandum in opposition to the property owner's motion for summary judgment, and vice versa, together with amicus curiae briefs by the California State Lands Commission, on or before March 23, 2010. Plaintiffs shall file their reply briefs on or before May 4, 2010. Defendant's reply shall be filed on or before June 4, 2010, if Defendant elects to file cross-motions for summary judgment. Upon the completion of briefing, the Court will schedule a hearing date and time for the matter to be heard.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/17/09 ORDERING the League's motion for a preliminary injunction 37 is GRANTED IN PART. It is hereby ORDERED that the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency ("TRPA") prohibit, until the Co urt resolves the merits of this case, construction or placement of any new boating facilities in Lake Tahoe pursuant to the Shorezone Ordinance Amendments. TRPA MAY, however, continue to process and issue conditional permits for new boating facilitie s. TRPA is preliminarily ENJOINED from issuing permits not in compliance with this order. Because this litigation is brought by non-profit organizations to protect the public interest in the protection and preservation of Lake Tahoe, no bond shall be required of plaintiffs (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/11/2009 DENYING 67 Motion to Shorten Time; If Gilmartin seeks to intervene, he shall notice a motion in accordance with the ordinary rules of this court. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/10/09 ORDERING that plaintiffs' Reply 64 Brief in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction and the accompanying filings are deemed to have been timely filed. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
62
STIPULATION and ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD 61 signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/26/09 ORDERING that the transcript filed as Exhibit A shall be included in the administrative record. (Engbretson, K.)
|
|
Filing
45
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/21/09 ORDERING the 37 Motion Hearing reset for 9/14/09 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; based upon the following conditions: Pending re solution of the motion for PI, TRPA will not issue any permits for new boating facilities as defined in the proposed order submitted by the League with the motion for PI as piers, buoys, boat ramps, boat slips and boat lifts that had not been placed within the Lake prior to the date the shorezone ordinance amendments took effect. Any filing in opposition to the motion for PI shall be filed no later than 8/21/09. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/7/09 ORDERING that League to Save Lake Tahoe v. TRPA, (No. 2:08-cv-2828 LKK GGH) and Shorezone Property Owners Assoc. v. TRPA (No. 2:08-cv-3081 LKK GGH) are hereby CONSOLIDATED. Case No. 2:08-cv- 2828 LKK GGH is designated as the "master file." The Clerk is directed to copy the operative complaint and the answer to the complaint from No. 2:08-cv-3081 LKK GGH, and to place those copies in the "master file." The Clerk is dir ected to administratively close case No. 2:08-cv-3081 LKK GGH. The parties are directed to file all future pleadings only in case no. 2:08-cv-2828 LKK GGH. TRPA SHALL produce the administrative record no later than May 20, 2009. Motions regarding the completeness of the administrative record and any supplementation thereof SHALL be filed no later than June 10, 2009. Status Conference set for 6/22/2009 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
10
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/6/09 ORDERING that the action denominated CIV. NO. 2:08-cv-03081-FCD-DAD is REASSIGNED to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton and Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows for all further proceedings , and any dates currently set in the reassigned case only, are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as CIV. NO. 2:08-cv-03081-LKK-GGH. Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr, and Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd are no longer assigned to 2:08cv3081. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
