Crawford v. We Hall Business et al
| Donald Crawford |
| We Hall Business, Pacific Corrugated Pipe Co., Jack Parson and Wells Fargo IRA |
| 2:2008cv03105 |
| December 22, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Banks and Banking Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/8/09 ORDERING that Pltf's 24 , 25 , 26 and 27 motions for continuance are DENIED. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that Dft We Hall Business' 9 motio n to dismiss be granted. Dft Wells Fargo Bank's 10 motion to dismiss be granted. Dft Wells Fargo Bank be dismissed from this action, and Pltf's complaint be dismissed in its entirety without leave to amend. The Clerk be directed to close the case. Motions referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections to F&Rs due within 14 days. (Engbretson, K.)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/6/2009 ORDERING 19 plaintiff's "Motion for Oral Conference in Chambers," is HEREBY DENIED. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/21/09 ORDERING that the hearing date of 4/29/09 is VACATED and CONTINUED to 5/20/09 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom No. 25. Pltf shall SHOW CAUSE no later than 5/6/09, why sanctions should not be impos ed for failure to respond to the pending motions to dismiss. Pltf shall also file an opposition or non-opposition to the motions no later than 5/6/09. Pltf is informed that failure to file an opposition or appear at the rescheduled hearing on 5/20/09 , will be deemed a statement of non-opposition, and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The court acknowledges the request of W.E. Hall Business, Inc. that it be permitted to appear telephonically at the hearing, the court will consider these requests prior to the hearing. (Engbretson, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
