Pandora Jewelry, LLC v. Bello Paradiso, LLC
Plaintiff: Pandora Jewelry, LLC
Defendant: Bello Paradiso, LLC
Case Number: 2:2008cv03108
Filed: December 19, 2008
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Trademark Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit: Defendant
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 15:1114 Trademark Infringement

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 137 CONSENT JUDGMENT signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 06/10/10. (Williams, D)
May 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 135 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/04/10 ORDERING that plf's 115 Motion to De-Designate Bello's supplier information and documents is GRANTED in part. (Benson, A.)
April 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 130 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/23/10 GRANTING 126 Motion to Seal. (Donati, J)
April 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 124 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/15/2010 ORDERING that Dft shall have up to and including 4/20/2010 to file its opposition to Pltf's motion to de-designate Dft's supplier information. (Engbretson, K.)
April 12, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/9/2010 GRANTING 117 Motion to File Documents Under Seal. (Engbretson, K.)
January 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 109 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/7/2010: Attorney Marc Burton Robinson withdrawn as attorney for Bello Paradiso, LLC. (Engbretson, K.)
November 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 106 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/18/09. (Duong, D)
November 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 101 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/2/2009 GRANTING in part dft's 88 Motion for Protective Order; parties shall submit a stipulation and proposed protective order within 10 days; parties shall submit a stipulation and proposed scheduling order or request a telephonic status conference within 14 days. (Suttles, J)
October 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 86 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/9/09 ORDERING the defendant to file and serve their brief regarding the unresolved protective order and special master issues on or before 10/13/09. Plaintiff's response due 10/20/09. Defendant's reply due 10/27/09. The unresolved protective order and special master issues hearing is set for 11/2/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd. (Donati, J)
October 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 84 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/5/09 ORDERING that the dates provided in the 28 scheduling order of 4/2/09 are VACATED. The time for filing motions relating to discovery is REOPENED. The parties SHALL ADHERE to a discovery schedule to be set by Magistrate Judge Drozd.The court will set a renewed scheduling order when the Magistrate Judge informs the court that it is feasible to do so.(Kastilahn, A)
September 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 9/3/2009 ORDERING 46 that plaintiff Pandora Jewelry's motion for attorneys' fees is GRANTED in the total sum of $6757.5. (Reader, L)
July 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/30/09 ORDERING that Plaintiff's MOTION to Dismiss 39 is GRANTED. Defendant's Counterclaims against Pandora Jewelry US are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff's MOTION to STRIKE [3 8] is GRANTED. Plaintiff SHALL file an affidavit detailing the costs incurred in connection with the filing of the Motion to strike within ten days of the filing of this order. Defendnat may file an affidavit in response no later than ten days after the affidavit is filed.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
April 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/21/09: The reference to "Pandora Jewelry U.S." on line 8 page 2 of the Court's April 2, 2009, Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference Order is erroneous and should read "Pandora Jewelry A/S, " such that Defendant must serve its counterclaim upon Pandora Jewelry A/S within 75 days from the date of entry of the Scheduling Order. (Kaminski, H)
January 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/12/2009 ORDERING 7 Bello Paradiso shall have up to and including 2/9/2009 to answer or otherwise respond to Pandora's complaint. (Reader, L) Modified on 1/13/2009 (Reader, L).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pandora Jewelry, LLC v. Bello Paradiso, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pandora Jewelry, LLC
Represented By: Douglas Peter Harvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bello Paradiso, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?