Oldcastle Glass, Inc. v. Arch Insurance Company, et al.
| Oldcastle Glass, Inc. |
| Arch Insurance Company, John Michael Riding and Hanson Glass & Mirror Co., Inc. |
| 2:2008cv03155 |
| December 23, 2008 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Miller Act Office |
| Sacramento |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| None |
| U.S. Government Plaintiff |
| 40:270 Miller Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER RE SETTLEMENT AND DISPOSITION signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/3/2009 ORDERING a dispositional document should be filed no later than 9/1/2009 and the status confernence set for 8/10/2009 is continued to 9/28/2009 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr.. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 4/9/09 ORDERING that the status conference set for 4/13/09 is CONTINUED to 5/11/09 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. A further joint status report shall be filed no l ater than 14 days prior to the 5/11/09 hearing date. If service has not been completed on or before 4/22/09, Pltf shall show cause by 4/23/09, why any unserved Dft should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to serve. If Pltf believes it has good cause justifying extension of Rule 4(m)s 120-day service period for any unserved Dft, Pltf shall file a declaration in which "good cause" is shown no later than 4/23/09. (Engbretson, K.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
