Gabalis v. Plainer et al
| Llewelyn L Gabalis |
| R. Plainer, A. Amero and G. Harrison |
| 2:2009cv00253 |
| January 28, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Lassen |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM, OPINION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 11/22/2010 ORDERING that Dfts' 30 Motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Clerk is directed to enter summary judgment in favor of Dfts and against Pltf and to close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/11/10 DENYING 27 Motion for injunctive relief. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER DENYING 25 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/21/2009. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/14/2009 DENYING 23 Motion to Compel without prejudice. (Suttles, J)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/5/09 ORDERING that pltf's 2 motion for leave to proceed ifp is GRANTED; pltf to pay the $350 filing fee; no initial partial filing fee to be assessed; monthly payments to be collected from pltfs trust acct until filing fee is paid in full. (cc: Financial)(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
