Lewis v. Cate
| Paul Lewis |
| Matthew Cate |
| 2:2009cv00517 |
| February 23, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Habeas Corpus (General) Office |
| Sacramento |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 5/13/2011 ORDERING Petitioner's 47 Request for an extension of time in which to file a motion for a certificate of appealability will be construed as a request for an extension of time in which to file a Notice of Appeal; Petitioner's request for an extension of time is GRANTED; Petitioner has 30 days from the date of this order in which to file his notice of appeal. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 1/31/11 ORDERING that Petitioner's notice of Appeal 41 is STRIKEN from the record as untimely, with leave to re-file within the statutory designated time frame. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
39
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Charlene H. Sorrentino on 01/10/11 RECOMMENDING that 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Lewis be Denied. Objections due within 21 days. (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/04/10 granting 31 discovery motion seeking a copy of the state court record. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/26/09 DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. Respondent is directed to fi le a response to petitioners habeas petition within sixty days; Petitioner's 2 motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED; Petitioners 8 document styled, Motion to Amend New Evidence, is DENIED; and Petitioners 9 document styled, Petition to Amend, is DENIED. (cc Michael Farrell)(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lewis v. Cate | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Paul Lewis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Matthew Cate | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
