Von Koenig v. Snapple Beverage Corporation
Plaintiff: Frances Von Koenig
Defendant: Snapple Beverage Corporation
Case Number: 2:2009cv00606
Filed: March 4, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Nature of Suit: Personal Property: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 130 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 05/20/11 ORDERING that all claims in the above-referenced matter are hereby DISMISSED w/ prejudice. The parties are to bear their own costs, fees, and expenses. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
May 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 127 ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE of Plaintiff Guy Cadwell's Claims pursuant to Stipulation signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/6/11. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
January 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 120 MEMORANDUM, and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 01/06/11 ORDERING that Defendant's MOTION to DISMISS Plaintiffs' claims arising out of advertisements and marketing, separate and apart from the labels identified in the complaint and submitted to the Court, is GRANTED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
September 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 9/7/2010 ORDERING this matter stayed. The parties shall submit a joint status report by 5:00 p.m. on March 1, 2011. Though the court may extend the stay upon a showing of good cause, the parties should be prepared to proceed with respect to plaintiffs claims if the FDA does not indicate clearly its willingness to act in the reasonably foreseeable future.(Matson, R)
June 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 89 STIPULATION and ORDER 88 for extension of time signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 6/23/2010. Response to plaintiffs' First Amended Consolidated Class Action Complaint shall be filed on or before 7/6/2010. (Marciel, M)
May 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 83 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 5/7/10 ORDERING that 68 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint in accordance with this order in 15 days from the date of this order. Defendants are granted 30 days from the date of service of plaintiffs second amended consolidated complaint to file a response thereto. (Dillon, M)
April 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER 77 for WITHDRAWAL of ATTORNEYS signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 3/31/2010. Plaintiff Guy Cadwell's counsel Miles D. Scully, Fletcher Carlton Alford, and Camille Joy DeCamp from the Law Firm of Gordon & Rees are TERMINATED from this action. (Marciel, M)
November 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 53 RELATED ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 11/17/2009 ORDERING that the action denominated, CIV S-09-2955 GEB KJM is reassigned to District Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr., and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings, an d any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as: CIV S-09-2955 FCD EFB. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk issue an Order Requiring a Joint Status Report for the undersigned. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment.(Matson, R)
September 4, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 09/04/9 ORDERING that dft's 37 Request for a ten-page page limit increase is GRANTED. A response of nomore than 30 pages to Plaintiff Frances Von Koenigs Amended Class Action Complaint shall be filed on or before 09/17/09. (Benson, A.)
July 9, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 7/9/2009 GRANTING 28 Plaintiff's Request for a five (5) page limit increase for their Oppposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. (Krueger, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Von Koenig v. Snapple Beverage Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Snapple Beverage Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Frances Von Koenig
Represented By: George Richard Baker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?