Johnson v. Makinen et al
| Scott Johnson |
| Ari Makinen and Tina Makinen |
| 2:2009cv00796 |
| March 20, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other Office |
| Sacramento |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
STIPULATED ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(2)signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 05/06/10. CASE CLOSED. (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
18
STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEUDLING) ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 9/4/09: All discovery shall be COMPLETED by 3/31/2010. Designation of Expert Witnesses is DUE by 4/13/2010, and supplemental list DUE by 5/4/2010. All expert discovery shall be COMPLETED by 6/4/2010. All dispositive motions shall be heard NO LATER THAN 8/6/2010. The Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 10/15/2010 at 02:00 PM, and a Bench Trial is SET for 1/19/2011 at 09:00 AM, both in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 07/14/09 ORDERING that dfts' 6 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED; plf has 10 days to submit an amended complaint to the court reflecting his reduced claim for damages. (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
