Hubbard v. Hougland et al
| Darryl Hubbard |
| C D Hougland and D McBride |
| 2:2009cv00939 |
| April 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| John A. Mendez |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
188
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/2/2016 IT IS SO ORDERED The parties are ORDERED to exchange copies of any exhibits which have not already been provided to the opposing party by 5:00 PM on 11/7/2016; The Court will not permit any e xhibits to be admitted at trial that were not provided to the opposing party prior to 11/7/2016; Lastly, it is mandatory the parties shall file a short, jointly-prepared statement concerning the nature of this case that will be read to the jury at the commencement of trial (NO EXCEPTIONS); the statement must be filed with the Court by 5:00 PM on 11/11/2016.(Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
180
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/18/16 ordering plaintiff's motion for a gag order 170 is construed as a motion for a protective order and is denied. Plaintiff's motion to compel 171 is denied. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
167
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 07/20/16 granting 166 Motion for leave to appear telephonically. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
164
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/30/16 ordering that on 7/27/16 plaintiff shall appear in person for the 10:00 a.m. hearing on counsel's motion to withdraw. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
159
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/30/15 ORDERING that Amir Nassihi, Joan Camagong, and Alicia Donahue of Shook, Hardy & Bacon are appointed as counsel in the above entitled matter for the purpose of pursing this action on plain tiffs behalf through pretrial and trial. Appointed counsel shall notify Sujean Park at (916) 930-4278, or via email at spark@caed.uscourts.gov if they have any questions related to the appointment. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order upon Amir Nassihi, Joan Camagong, and Alicia Donahue, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, One Montgomery Street, Suite 2700, San Francisco, CA 94104. (Joan Camagong is not admitted to the Eastern District of California. Ms. Camagong to file petition for admission to the district.)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
155
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/2/2015 SETTING a settlement conference for 8/3/2015 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. Parties shall submit confidential settlement statements no later than 7/27/2015. (cc: CKD, ADR) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
153
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 05/18/15 ordering that within 14 days of the filing of this order, the parties shall each file a signed Notice Regarding Waiver of Disqualification, indicating whether they will agree to the undersigned serving as the settlement judge. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
152
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 3/2/2015 ORDERING that plaintiff's 149 motion for an extension is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part, denied as premature with respect to the the request to extend the time for pretrial stat ements and disclosures and granted with respect to the request to extend the time for dispositive motions, and the parties have 60 days to file any dispositive motions; plaintiff's 151 motion for leave to submit additional discovery requests is DENIED; and plaintiff's 150 motion for clarification is GRANTED to the extent clarification regarding plaintiff's claims has been provided with this order. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/23/14 ordering defendants must file proof of having timely served the supplemental responses forthwith, and in any case, within 7 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/7/2014 DENYING, as unnecessary, plaintiff's 140 motion for a new Scheduling and Discovery Order. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
141
PROTECTIVE ORDER regarding the 133 court order denying in part, and granting in part, plaintiff's motion to compel, signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/27/2014. See Order for Details. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
137
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/12/14 ORDERING that, upon reconsideration, the 133 Order of the magistrate judge filed 3/18/14, is AFFIRMED. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
133
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 03/17/14 ordering defendants must submit a proposed protective order within 7 days with respect to the discovery ordered below. Plaintiff's motion to compel further discovery responses 123 is granted in part to the extent specified above, as to the following discovery requests: a) Int. Nos. 8,9,11,12, and 13 propounded upond defendant Houghland; b) RFP Nos. 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7 directed to defendant Houghland; c)Int. Nos. 6,7,11 propounded upond defendant McBride; and d) RFP Nos. 1 and 4 directed upon defendant McBride. The motion is denied in all other respects. Upon issuance of a protective order, the discovery responses and documentation herein ordered must be provided to plaintiff within 30 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 01/13/14 granting 130 Motion to modify the dispostive motion deadline. Dispositive motions shall be filed no later than 60 days after the court rules on the pending motion to compel. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
116
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 1/11/13 plaintiff's 10/22/12 and 12/03/12 motions for electronic filing 109 , 113 are denied. Plaintiff's 11/29/12 and 12/21/12 motions to continue the discovery deadline 112 , 115 are denied. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/24/12 ADOPTING IN FULL 107 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 39 Motion to Dismiss. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
107
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/26/2012 RECOMMENDING that the 39 motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies be denied. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
99
ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 07/25/12 ordering the custodian to produce Michael M. Cottrell via video conferencing at 08/14/12 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom 9 before Judge Gregor y G. Hollows. Custodian is ordered to notify the court of any changes in custody and to provide new custodian with a copy of this writ. Clerk shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian. (cc: I.T. Dept, Sacramento)(3 certified copies of this writ sent to the Warden, CSP Sacramento)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
90
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/19/12 ordering effective as of the date of entry of this order, the stay on discovery is partially lifted as to the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies. Discovery r equests served before the entry date of this order shall be treated as served on the entry date of this order. Any further requests for written discovery must be served within 2 court days of the entry of this order. Written discovery responses are due via electronic or personal service on or before 07/13/12. The parties shall submit witness lists and exhibit lists on or before 07/20/12. The partial lift of the discovery stay as to the issue of exhaustion of administrative remedies shall expire on 07/20/12. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 04/27/12 ( Evidentiary Hearing set for 8/14/2012 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 9 (GGH) before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows.) No later than 45 days prior to the evidentiary hearing, defendant shall inform the court if plaintiff's facility will be able to provide video conferencing so plaintiff may appear by video. (See order for further details) (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER denying 68 Pltf's Motion to Stay, signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/30/10. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
64
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 06/11/10 recommending that defendants motion to dismiss filed on 11/10/09 39 be granted and this case dismissed. Motion to Dismiss 39 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 04/05/10 ordering plaintiff's motions for leave to file third and fourth amended complaints 38 , 51 are vacated as superseded by plaintiff's motion to file the fifth amended complain t 58 . Plaintiff's motion to extend the discovery cut-off deadline 56 is granted; the dates set in the 10/01/09 scheduling order are vacated and will be re-set following resolution of defendants' motion to dismiss, if appropriate; discovery is stayed pending resolution of the motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's motion to amend 52 is denied. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
37
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/22/09 ORDERING that w/in 20 days, dfts to file a response to the 30 second amended cmplt. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
33
DISCOVERY and SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/1/09: Discovery due by 1/15/2010; All Pretrial Motions, except motions to compel discover, due by 3/12/2010; Pretrial Conference and Trial dates will be set as appropriate. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
