Douglas v. Sacramento County et al
Plaintiff: Irwin Douglas
Defendant: Sacramento County, Sacramento County Sheriff Department, Robert Falk and Williams
Case Number: 2:2009cv01038
Filed: April 17, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Frank C. Damrell
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/26/12 ADOPTING in full 84 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, with addition of the full citation of Miller v. Los Angeles Bd. of Educ., 827 F.2d 617, 621 (9th Cir. 1987), used in the first instance on page 4 at line 4; and DENYING 75 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Meuleman, A)
November 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 84 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/14/11 recommending that defendants' motion for attorney's fees 75 be denied. Motion for Award of Attorneys Fees 75 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
October 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/5/11 ORDERING Hearing on 75 MOTION for ATTORNEY FEES CONTINUED to 11/2/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan; Show Cause Response why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to timely file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion due by 10/19/2011; Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later th an 10/19/11; Failure of plaintiff to file an opposition will be deemed a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion, and may result in a recommendation that the motion be granted; Defendants may file a reply to plaintiffs opposition, if any, on or before 10/26/11 (Responses due by 10/19/2011, Replies due by 10/26/2011.) (Meuleman, A)
May 27, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/27/11 ORDERING that defendants' motion to modify the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order, Dckt. No. 67, and the Ex Parte Application to hear that motion on shortened time, Dckt. No. 68, are GRANTED. The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order is modified as follows: Final Pretrial Conference: October 5, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. and the Date for Filing Joint Statement: September 21, 2011.(Matson, R)
March 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/17/11 ORDERING that Defendants' Ex Parte Application to modify the Scheduling order 64 is GRANTED. The Final Pretrial Conference, which is currently scheduled for 4/6/11, is CONTINUED to 7/6/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24. The parties shall file pretrial statements, as required by the 11/10/09 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) order, no later than 6/22/11. The 6/7/11 trial date is VACATED at this time. If the 2/10/11 Findings and Recommendations are not adopted, a new trial date will be set before Magistrate Judge Edmund E. Brennan. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
February 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 61 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, recommending that defendants' 40 be granted; plaintiff's 44 47 Motions to disregard evidence and defendants' documents be denied; defendants' 50 51 Motion to Strike evidence and documents su bmitted by plaintiff be denied; and Clerk be directed to enter Judgment for defendants and close this case, signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/9/2011. Within 14 days after being served with F/Rs, any party may file written Objections with Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Marciel, M)
November 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/08/10 ORDERING that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) 24 is MODIFIED as follows: Final Pretrial Conference is CONTINUED from 12/8/10 to 4/6/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. Trial is CONTINUED from 2/8/11 to 6/7/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
August 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/30/10 GRANTING 48 MOTION for EXTENSION OF TIME. Motion Hearing re-set for 9/22/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Williams, D)
August 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/10/10: Defendants' request to seal 38 is granted, and the Clerk of Court is directed to file under seal the unredacted version of defendants' summary judgment motion and all documents in support thereof. The documents shall remain sealed until otherwise ordered. (Kaminski, H)
August 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/5/10 ORDERING that defts are directed to file a redacted version of their motion for summary judgment/adjudication on the publicly available docket not later than 8/12/10. Thereafter, the court will determine whether the unredacted version of the motion that has already been provided to the Court and to pltf shall be filed under seal. (Owen, K)
May 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 5/20/2010 ORDERING that because the evidence plaintiff challenges is not being considered by the court at this time, plaintiff's 35 motion is premature and is therefore denied without prejudice. If the evidence at issue is offered by defendants in support of a motion for summary judgment or is listed as evidence to be offered at trial, plaintiff may raise his objections to the evidence at the appropriate time.(Duong, D)
April 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 AMENDED 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 04/08/10 ORDERING that, pursuant to FRCP and Local Rules, discovery documents # 28 , # 31 , # 32 are STRICKEN. Clerk shall REDACT plf's DOB and include only the year on document s: Dckt. No. 28 at 5, Dckt. No. 31 at 2:24, Dckt. No. 31 at 7, Dckt. No. 31 at 8, and Dckt. No. 32 at 15. Clerk shall REDACT plf's SSN and include only the four numbers on documents: Dckt. No. 31 at 2:19, Dckt. No. 31at 7, and Dckt. No. 31 at 8. Additionally, on 03/15/10, dfts filed their 29 expert disclosure in accordance with the 11/10/09 status (pretrial scheduling) order and the 01/22/10 amendment thereto. On 03/30/10, plf filed objections to dfts' expert designation, challenging the expert's qualifications and the substance of his testimony. Because those objections are premature, they will be DISREGARDED at this time. (Benson, A.)
January 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/22/10 ORDERING that:Defendants' ex parte application to modify the 11/10/09 scheduling order, 25 , 26 , is granted; The parties shall make their initial expert disclosures on or before 3/15/10; and shall make their rebuttal expert disclosures on or before 4/19/10. These modifications do not impact any of the other deadlines set forth in the 11/10/09 scheduling order.(Becknal, R)
October 19, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/19/09 ORDERING that Plaintiff shall show cause, in writing, on or before November 4, 2009, why sanctions should not be imposed upon him for his failure to appear at the October 14, 2009 status conference; A further status conference is set for November 18, 2009, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom No. 25; and Failure of plaintiff to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Becknal, R)
September 11, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/11/09 ORDERING that the status conference set for 9/23/09 is CONTINUED to 10/14/09 at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom No. 25. The parties are directed to hold a FRCP 26(f) conference no later than 9/23/09. The parties are directed to file a joint status report by 9/30/09. The Clerk is to send Pltf a copy of this Court's 4/17/09 order. Pltf's 13 Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. (Engbretson, K.)
August 12, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/11/2009. Status Conference currently set for 8/19/2009 is VACATED and RE-SCHEDULED for 9/23/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (EFB). Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE in writing, on or before 9/9/2009, why sanctions should not be imposed on him for failure to file Status Report. Plaintiff shall also file his Status Report by 9/9/2009. Clerk directed to send plaintiff a copy of Court's 4 Order filed 4/17/2009. (Marciel, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Douglas v. Sacramento County et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Irwin Douglas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sacramento County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sacramento County Sheriff Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Falk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?