Hill v. County of Sacramento et al
Plaintiff: Ann Hill
Defendant: County of Sacramento, Roger Dickinson, Roberta MacGlashan, Susan Peters, Jimmie Yee, Don Nottoli, Sacramento Airport System and G. Hardee Acree
Case Number: 2:2009cv01565
Filed: June 5, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 91 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 10/27/10 GRANTING 70 Motion for Summary Judgment. CASE CLOSED. (Williams, D)
August 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 82 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/24/2010 GRANTING extension of time for Dfts to file a reply brief to Pltf's opposition to motion for summary judgment and/or summary adjudication. (Zignago, K.)
August 17, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 8/16/10 ORDERING that Hill's MOTION for Reconsideration 66 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
June 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 64 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/15/2010 ORDERING 63 joint statement shall be filed in no later than seven days before the scheduled hearing; filing deadline set for: 6/24/2010. (Reader, L)
June 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 62 STIPULATION and ORDER 61 for Proective Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/3/10. (Kastilahn, A)
April 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 60 OORDER AMENDING SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 04/01/10 ORDERING that initial expert witness disclosure requirements are due by 06/04/10 and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure is due by 07/02/10. (Benson, A.)
March 31, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/30/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff's amended motion to compel, filed 2/19/10 49 is granted in part; Defendants shall produce documents and a declaration by the County within (7) days of this order, other than the documents ordered to be produced by close ofbusiness on the day of the hearing; and Plaintiff's motion for sanctions is granted in part in the above amount set forth.(Becknal, R)
February 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER AMENDING THE SCHEDULING ORDER, signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 2/20/2010: The initial expert witness disclosure is now DUE on or before April 30, 2010, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure is now DUE on or before May 28, 2010. (Kastilahn, A)
December 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER AMENDING THE SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/21/09: Each party shall comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(c)(i)'s initial expert witness disclosure requirements on or before March 15, 2010, and any contradictory and/or rebuttal expert disclosure authorized under Rule 26(a)(2)(c)(ii) on or before April 15, 2010. (Kaminski, H)
December 21, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/18/09 GRANTING in part and DENYING in part 40 Motion for Protective Order. Defendants shall file their Rule 26 disclosure statement forthwith; Joint Stipulation to extend expert disclosure dates to March, 2010, due forthwith. Defendant's shall produce all Rule 26 disclosures by 1/15/10; remaining documents due by 2/15/10; privilege log due by 2/15/10; stipulated protective order due by 2/15/10. (Owen, K)
November 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/13/09 ORDERING that the County shall file no later than 11/25/09 any objections to the requests for production; joint statement due no later than 12/11/09; Hearing for discovery disputes set for 12/17/2009 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (GGH) before Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows; time in which to answer requests for production is tolled until further order of the court, to issue after the 12/17/09 hearing. (Manzer, C)
July 31, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/31/09 ORDERING that plaintiff's 31 request for an injunction pending appeal filed July 31, 2009, is DENIED. (Duong, D)
July 30, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/30/09 DENYING 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Donati, J)
July 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/17/09 re 17 ORDERING that Plaintiff's reply brief in connection with the hearing now scheduled for July 27, 2009, shall be filed no later than noon on July 22, 2009.(Duong, D)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hill v. County of Sacramento et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ann Hill
Represented By: Anthony T. Caso
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of Sacramento
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roger Dickinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Roberta MacGlashan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Susan Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jimmie Yee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Don Nottoli
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sacramento Airport System
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: G. Hardee Acree
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?