Duarte v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District Duarte v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Duarte v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Plaintiff:	Jesus Duarte
Defendant:	State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Case Number:	2:2009cv01623
Filed:	June 11, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge:	Frank C. Damrell
Nature of Suit:	Defendant
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 9, 2009	Filing 13 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 9/8/09 DENYING 6 Motion to Strike. (Engbretson, K.)
July 27, 2009	Filing 9 ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 7/27/09 ORDERING that the hearing on Defendant's 6 Motion to Strike Portions of the Complaint is CONTINUED to September 4, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiff shall file and serve its opposition brief or notice of non-opposition no later than August 21, 2009. The Defendant may file and serve their reply on or before August 28, 2009. Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to show cause why he should not be sanctioned in the amou nt of $150 for failing to file an opposition or notice of non-opposition to defendant's motion. Plaintiff's counsel shall file his response to the order to show cause on or before August 21, 2009. A hearing on the order to show cause, if necessary, will follow the hearing on the motion.(Duong, D)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 9, 2009

Filing 13 ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 9/8/09 DENYING 6 Motion to Strike. (Engbretson, K.)

July 27, 2009

Filing 9 ORDER and ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 7/27/09 ORDERING that the hearing on Defendant's 6 Motion to Strike Portions of the Complaint is CONTINUED to September 4, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. Plaintiff shall file and serve its opposition brief or notice of non-opposition no later than August 21, 2009. The Defendant may file and serve their reply on or before August 28, 2009. Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to show cause why he should not be sanctioned in the amou nt of $150 for failing to file an opposition or notice of non-opposition to defendant's motion. Plaintiff's counsel shall file his response to the order to show cause on or before August 21, 2009. A hearing on the order to show cause, if necessary, will follow the hearing on the motion.(Duong, D)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Duarte v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Represented By:	Cherie Marie Sutherland
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesus Duarte
Represented By:	Jeffrey David Tochterman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?