Burley v. San Joaquin County Sheriff's Office et al
| Silvia Burley |
| San Joaquin County Sheriff's Office and IndyMac Bank |
| 2:2009cv01657 |
| June 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/24/10 RECOMMENDING that this case be dismissed without prejudice and that the Tribe be informed that if it wishes to re-file this action, it may only appear in federal court through an attorney; the Clerk be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections to F&R due within 21 days of service. (Owen, K)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/21/10, ORDERING that pltf and dfts shall appear at a status conference on 6/24/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. Pltf and dft shall file their status reports on or before 6/10/2010.(Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/13/2010 ORDERING that pltf shall file status report within 14 days [stating therein whether this action should be dismissed]. (Suttles, J)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
