Ventura v. Sisto et al
| Antonio Ventura |
| D. K. Sisto and Arnold Schwarzenegger |
| 2:2009cv01873 |
| July 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Kimberly J. Mueller |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/27/2011 RECOMMENDING that Ptnr's 1 application for writ of habeas corpus be denied and this case be closed. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Objections to F&R due within 21 days. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER denying 13 Motion to Stay signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 08/16/10. Their response to petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is due within 30 days (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/12/10 DIRECTING RESPONDENT to File a Response to Petition within 60 days. Clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the Petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc Michael Farrell)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER re 3 GRANTING PETITIONER AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO PAY THE FILING FEE OR FILE IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION. Signed by Judge Claudia Wilken on 2/2/09. (scc, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/2/2009) [Transferred from cand on 7/9/2009.]
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
