Schwartz et al v Citi Mortgage et al
| Peter Schwartz and Julie Rathbone |
| Citi Mortgage, Indymac Federal Bank, First Magnus Financial Corporation, Quality Loan Service Corporation, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc., Charter Funding and James Shergill |
| 2:2009cv02387 |
| August 26, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| John A. Mendez |
| Plaintiff |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/8/11 ORDERING that the actions denominated 2:11-CV-1177-KJM-EFB and 2:10-CV-0516-WBS-JFM are REASSIGNED to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in the reassigned cases only are VACATED. The caption on documents filed in the reassigned cases shall be shown as 2:11-CV-1177-JAM DAD and 2:10-CV-0516-JAM-DAD. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
26
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 12/1/09 ORDERING that after carefully considering the papers submitted in this matter, the Court hereby grants both 9 motions to dismiss. All claims against Citi and MERS are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Duong, D)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
