Kaulick v. Martel, et al
Petitioner: Steven Kaulick
Respondent: Ana Maria Martel, Superior Court of Amador County and People of The State of California
Case Number: 2:2009cv02611
Filed: September 17, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/22/10 ORDERING the 08/25/10 order 36 is vacated. Also, RECOMMENDING that Defendants' 08/23/10 motion to dismiss 35 be granted. Defendant Garcia be dismissed; and this action be dismissed for failure to state a civil rights claim. MOTION to DISMISS 35 referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M)
June 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 6/29/2010 re 24 ORDERING that that, upon reconsideration, the 20 order of the magistrate judge filed April 16, 2010, is AFFIRMED. (Duong, D)
April 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Steven Kaulik signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/20/10. CDC is to collect monthly payments and fwd to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of pltf's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial w/ a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
April 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/14/10 DENYING 17 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
January 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/27/2010 ORDERING that 3 the motion to appoint counsel is DENIED w/out prejudice; and the 8 motion to supplement is DENIED as moot; and RECOMMENDING that the petition for writ of mandamus be dismissed w/out prejudice and petitioner be granted 30 days from the dismissal of the petition to file a civil rights cmplt. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R w/in 21 days.(Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kaulick v. Martel, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Steven Kaulick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ana Maria Martel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Superior Court of Amador County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: People of The State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?