Miller v. Williams et al
| Ernest Miller |
| M. Williams and Davis |
| 2:2009cv03598 |
| December 29, 2009 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/8/2010 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed w/out prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections to F&R due w/in 21 days.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/5/2010 ADOPTING 9 Findings and Recommendations in full. Pltf's 6 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED. Pltf is directed to pay in full the $350 filing fee within 21 days. Pltf's 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Engbretson, K.)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/14/10 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
