Webb v. Trinity et al
| Barbara Webb |
| County Of Trinity, Linda Wright, Laurie Sumner and Elizabeth Hamilton |
| 2:2010cv00012 |
| January 4, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Trinity |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
61
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 5/20/11 ORDERING that This Action is DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1), with the parties bearing their own costs and attorneys' fees. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/13/11, ORDERING that dispositional documents disposing of this case shall be filed no LATER than 45 days from the effective date of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/8/11 ORDERING a further status conference is set for 2/15/11 at 2:30 p.m.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
49
STIPULATION and ORDER 48 for continuance signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/9/2010. Further Status Conference is CONTINUED to 2/7/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK). Parties shall file updated Status Report 14 days prior to hearing. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/3/2010 ORDERING that the court GRANTS IN PART Defendants' 38 motion to dismiss and ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Defendants' motion is GRANTED only insofar as plaintiff's claim against Sum ner and Hamilton is premised upon the theory that their action in this case are sufficiently related to the duties and powers incidental to their jobs for § 1983 liability to lie. Defendants' motion is otherwise DENIED. The surviving theor ies of liability include, inter alia, that Sumner and Hamilton are liable under § 1983 as conspirators with government officials and that defendants' failure to reinstate plaintiff in violation of the SPB order constitutes a violation of th e First Amendment. Defendants' motion to dismiss allegations of the April 2010 job offer premised upon the Noerr-Pennington doctrine are DENIED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants' motion to dismiss allegations of the April 2010 job offer as privileged or otherwise inadmissible is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Duong, D) Modified on 11/4/2010 (Duong, D).
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/26/2010. Further Status Conference is SET for 11/22/2010 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK). (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 08/09/10 GRANTING in part 29 Motion to Dismiss; Plaintiffs' state law claims (1-4) are DISMISSED without prejudice; Plaintiffs' federal claims (1-4) are DISMISSED without prejudice; as to the last theory of liability, defendants' 29 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint within 21 days of the date of this order. (Williams, D) Modified on 8/11/2010 (Williams, D).
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/3/2010 ORDERING 19 Status Conference RESCHEDULED for 9/7/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
23
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 05/07/10 ORDERING that dfts' 8 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED w/o prejudice as to the First Amended Complaint in its entirety. Plaintiff is GRANTED leave tofile and serve a Second Amended Complaint w/i 30 days. The 05/24/10 hearing is VACATED. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
21
STIPULATION AND ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 4/5/10 ORDERING that the Defendants' MOTION to DISMISS 8 will be heard on 5/24/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 with the Plaintiff's opposition or statement on non-opposition and the defendants' reply due to be filed and served in accordance with LR 230(c) with reference to the 5/24/10, hearing date.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/4/2010, ORDERING that the Status Conference currently set for 3/8/2010 is VACATED and RESET for 6/7/2010 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
15
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/22/2010 ORDERING 14 Motion to Dismiss Hearing 8 RESET for 4/19/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/2/10 ORDERING that counsel has filed a response to the Order to Show Cause 9 , therefore, the court finds no sanction is appropriate. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/28/2010, ORDERING pltf to SHOW CAUSE in writing why sanctions should not issue in accordance with Local Rule 110, including a fine of $150 and/or dismissal of this case. Counsel shall file a response to this order to show cause NO LATER THAN 2/8/2010. The hearing on 8 dfts' motion to dismiss is CONT'D to 2/22/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Pltf's opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed and served ON or BEFORE 2/8/2010. Dfts may file and serve a reply NO LATER THAN 2/16/2010. (Kastilahn, A)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
