Green v. Alliance Title et al
Plaintiff: Kwanza Green
Defendant: Alliance Title, CMG Mortgage, Inc., Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and National Default Servicing Corporation
Case Number: 2:2010cv00242
Filed: January 29, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Morrison C. England
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/10/11 ORDERING 69 Findings and Recommendations are adopted in full; 59 Motion to Remand is Granted; This action is REMANDED to Solano County Superior Court. Copy of remand order sent to other court. Defendants' 60 Motion to Dismiss, 64 Motion to Dismiss and 67 Motion to Strike are denied without prejudice to them being re-filed in the state court action. CASE CLOSED.(Matson, R)
December 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/3/2010. Court has ORDERED 12/8/2010, 12/15//2010, and 1/5/2011 Motions hearing dates be VACATED; and RECOMMENDS that plaintiff's 59 Motion to Remand be g ranted, this action be remanded to Solano County Superior Court, and defendants' Motions 60 64 to Dismiss and 67 Motion to Strike Lis Pendens be denied without prejudice to them being re-filed in State Court action. Within 14 days after being served with these F/Rs, any party may file written Objections with Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Marciel, M)
September 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER adopting 52 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 9/24/10: Defendant SPS's motion to dismiss is granted 9 . Defendant CMG's motion to dismiss is granted 26 . Plaintiff's complaint is dismi ssed in its entirety, with leave to amend. Plaintiff' motions to amend and for joinder, are granted in part and denied in part 28 , 44 , 46 . Defendant SPS' motion to expunge a lis pendens recorded by or on behalf of plaintiff is denied without prejudice 16 . Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of service of this order to ile an amended complaint. (Kaminski, H)
September 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/2/2010 ORDERING the status conference currently set for 9/29/2010 is vacated; and motion 19 Motion to Remand and 19 Motion for Sanctions is denied. IT IS FU RTHER RECOMMENDED that Defendant SPS's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint, Dckt. No. 9, be granted; Defendant CMG's motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint, Dckt. No. 26, be granted; Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed in its entirety, with leave to amend; Plaintiff's motions to amend and for joinder, Dckt. Nos. 28, 44, and 46, be granted inpart and denied in part; Defendant SPS's motion to expunge a lis pendens recorded by or on behalf of plaintiff, Dckt. No. 16, be denied without prejudice; and Plaintiff be granted 30 days from the date of service of any order adopting these findings and recommendations to file an amended complaint. Objections to the findings and recommendations due w/in 14 days.(Matson, R)
April 9, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/8/2010 ORDERING that Pltf's 33 Motion for an Enlargement of Time is GRANTED. Hearing on motions 9 , 16 , 19 , 26 , and 28 , are CONTINUED to 5/26/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24. Pl tf shall file an opposition or a statement of nonopposition to each of Dfts' motions by 5/12/2010. Dfts may file a reply to any opposition filed by Pltf by 5/19/2010. The Status Conference is CONTINUED to 6/30/2010 at 10:00 AM. The parties shall file status reports by 6/16/2010. (Engbretson, K.)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Green v. Alliance Title et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alliance Title
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CMG Mortgage, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Represented By: Peter Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Default Servicing Corporation
Represented By: Peter Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kwanza Green
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?