Lau v. California Government Code 68635
Plaintiff: Hon Lau
Defendant: California Government Code 68635
Case Number: 2:2010cv00297
Filed: February 4, 2010
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Diego
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/8/11 ORDERING that on 8/29/11, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. The notice is also styled as a motion for reconsideration. This civil rights action was closed on 3/10/11. Plaintiff is advised that documents filed by plaintiff since the closing date will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. (Becknal, R)
March 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Hon Lau signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/9/2011. CDC is to collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance and fwd to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of pltf's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial w/ a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
November 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/8/10 ORDERING that plaintiff is granted a period of thirty days to file a notice of voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).(Dillon, M)
October 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/07/10 granting 21 Motion for relief. The court's 06/08/10 order to show cause is discharged. Plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order a properly completed in forma pauperis application that includes a certified copy of plaintiff's prison trust account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint in this action and a prison official's certification. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner for use in a civil rights action. (Plummer, M)
June 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/8/10 ORDERING that 19 Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED; Within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for failure to pay the filing fee in full or file a properly completed in forma pauperis application.(Dillon, M)
May 24, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 05/24/10 denying 17 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order a properly completed in forma pauperis application that includes a certified copy of pla intiff's prison trust account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint in this action and a prison official's certification. The clerk of the court shall send plaintiff an application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner for use in a civil rights action. (Plummer, M)
May 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/5/2010 ORDERING that pltf's 14 motion to proceed IFP is DENIED w/out prejudice; pltf to submit, w/in 30 days, a properly completed ifp that includes the required certification; and the clerk to send pltf an ifp application. (Yin, K)
April 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/20/10 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order a properly completed in forma pauperis application that includes a certified copy of plaintiffs prison trust ac count statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint in this action and a prison officials certification; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner for use in a civil rights action.(Dillon, M)
February 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/12/10 DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP without prejudice; Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order a properly completed in forma pauperis application that includes a certi fied copy of plaintiffs prison trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint in this action and a prison officials certification; and Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner for use in a civil rights action. (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lau v. California Government Code 68635
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hon Lau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: California Government Code 68635
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?