Berry v. Jacquez
Donald Joseph Berry |
Francisco Jacquez |
2:2010cv00305 |
February 5, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Del Norte |
John F. Moulds |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 10/20/14: The Amended Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT this Court issues a C ertificate of Appealability only with respect to Berry's interrelated claims that the first line of CALJIC 8.51 violated his right to due process and was not harmless error, and that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to object to that instruction. This Court declines to issues a Certificate of Appealability with respect to the remainder of Berry's claims. The Clerk of the Court is to enter judgment accordingly. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 64 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/3/13: Petitioner's Reply Brief is due February 8, 2013.(Kaminski, H) |
Filing 52 ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 12/1/11 ORDERING that the Findings and Recommendations filed October 5, 2011, are Adopted in Full; and Petitioner's April 11, 2011 request to STAY this action is GRANTED. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 50 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 11/22/11 ordering that the deadline for petitioner to file a response to respondent's objections to the findings and recommendations is continued to Friday, 12/02/11. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 45 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 10/04/11 ORDERING that petitioner's motion to amend is granted. Also, RECOMMENDING that petitioner's request to stay this action be granted. MOTION to STAY 37 referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 43 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 9/1/2011 re 42 ORDERING that the deadline for Petitioner to submit supplemental briefing evidencing the nature of his "mental health problems," is CONTINUED to Wednesday, September 14, 2011. (Duong, D) |
Filing 41 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 8/29/11 ORDERING that petitioner shall submit, within 7 days of the date of this order, supplemental briefing evidencing the nature of his mental health problems. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 40 ORDER denying 25 Motion for competency hearing signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 05/13/11. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/27/11 ORDERING that John Balazs, Attorney at Law, shall be substituted in as appointed counsel for petitioner in place of the Office of the Federal Defender for the Eastern District of California.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 1/18/2011 ORDERING that the FD is appointed to represent ptnr; the clerk to serve a copy of the petition and this order on David Porter; ptnr's counsel shall contact the clerk's office to m ake arrangements for copies; a status conference is SET for 3/31/2011 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 26 before Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds; all parties to appear at the status conference by counsel; 14 days prior to the conference, the parties shall file and serve status reports. (Yin, K) |
Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 10/19/10 ordering this matter is referred to the Federal Defender for the Eastern District of California who shall, within 15 days, report to the court whether petitioner qualifies for appointment of counsel and, if so, whether Mr. Bonneau should be appointed to represent him. The clerk of the court is directed to send a copy of this order to the Federal Defender's Office, 801 I Street, 3rd floor, Sacramento, CA 95814. (cc: Federal Defender)(Plummer, M) |
Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 8/10/2010 DENYING, w/out prejudice, ptnr's 21 request for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K) |
Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 3/29/2010 DIRECTING respondent to file a response to the petition w/in 45 days; traverse due w/in 30 days of answer; the clerk to serve a copy of this order, a copy of the petition and the Order re Consent on the Attorney General. (cc: Michael Farrell)(Yin, K) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/16/10 ORDERING that petitioner shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Berry v. Jacquez | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Donald Joseph Berry | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Francisco Jacquez | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.