Bassett v. Callison, et al
Plaintiff: Richard Bassett
Defendant: Sweart, Staniff and E. Callison
Case Number: 2:2010cv00539
Filed: March 5, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Lassen
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 96 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/1/11 GRANTING 93 Motion to Dismiss. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
March 29, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/29/11 DENYING 90 Motion to Compel; DENYING 91 Motion to Compel ; Defendant Callison is granted an extension of time in which to answer the first set of interrogatories until on or before April 17, 2011. (Dillon, M)
February 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER denying 88 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 02/22/11. (Plummer, M)
February 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 87 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/11/2011 ORDERING that pltf's 85 and 86 motions are DENIED; pltf's 84 reply is DISREGARDED. (Yin, K)
January 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/4/11 denying 75 Motion ; denying 79 Motion. (Dillon, M)
December 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 78 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/21/10 ORDERING that 48 Motion for injunctive relief is DENIED without prejudice; 67 Motion for TRO is DENIED without prejudice. (Dillon, M)
November 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/15/10 ORDERING pltf's motions for extension of time 64 , 65 are DENIED; pltfs 10/27/10 request 63 is DENIED. (Carlos, K)
October 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 60 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/26/10 ORDERING that plaintiff's 10/6/10 motion for the appointment of counsel 54 is denied. (Becknal, R)
September 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 49 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/20/10 ORDERING that defendants shall respond to plaintiffs September 16, 2010 motion on or before October 5, 2010. Plaintiffs reply, if any, shall be filed fourteen days thereafter. (Dillon, M)
August 5, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/4/10 ORDERING that plaintiffs 33 motion to amend is granted; Defendants 43 request for extension is granted; Defendants Callison and Swart shall respond to the second amended complaint on or before sixty days from the date of this order; and Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of the 34 second amended complaint on counsel for defendants. Plaintiffs 39 motion is denied without prejudice. (Dillon, M)
June 11, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/11/10 ordering plaintiff's 05/19/10 motion 26 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's 05/26/10 motion 28 is denied without prejudice. Plaintiff's 06/01/10 letter 29 is disregarded. Plaintiff's 06/03/10 requests 30 are denied without prejudice. (Plummer, M)
June 7, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/4/10 ORDERING that defendant Staniff is dismissed from this action without prejudice.(Dillon, M)
April 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/29/2010 DENYING 15 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Richard Bassett. (Reader, L)
April 6, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/5/2010 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Richard Bassett. (cc CDC and Financial)(Matson, R)
March 29, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/26/10 ordering plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the clerk of the court, or the appropriate filing fee. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner.(Plummer, M)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bassett v. Callison, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sweart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Staniff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E. Callison
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Bassett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?