Pao v. On Habeas Corpus
Petitioner: Ge Lor Pao
Respondent: On Habeas Corpus
Case Number: 2:2010cv00758
Filed: March 25, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Dale A. Drozd
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 10/18/11 ORDERING that petitioner's 38 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; petitioner's objections to 37 F&Rs are due by 11/09/11. (Benson, A.)
September 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 37 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer on 9/8/2011 ORDERING that Petitioner's request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED; and petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is DENIED. IT IS RECOMMENDING that the amended petition 12 for writ of habeas corpus be denied; Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr; Objections due within 21 days after being served with these F & R's. (Reader, L)
July 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii; Due to the appointment of Recalled Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer to the bench of the Eastern District, this action is REASSIGNED from Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd to Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Bommer for all further proceedings. The District Judge currently assigned to the case will remain unchanged. (Donati, J)
August 26, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/25/2010 ORDERING that ptnr to be reimbursed in the amt of $5.00; and the clerk to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Dpt. (cc: Financial) (Yin, K)
June 28, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/28/2010 ORDERING that petitioner's hc application is DISMISSED w/ leave to file an amended petition w/in 30 days; the clerk to send petitioner the form for hc application.(Yin, K)
April 2, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/1/10 ORDERING that petitioner shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send petitioner a copy of the in forma pauperis form used by this district.(Dillon, M)
March 30, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 03/29/2010. CASE TRANSFERRRED to Sacramento Division. New Case Number 2:10-cv-758 DAD. Old Case Number 1:10-cv-529 DLB.(Flores, E)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pao v. On Habeas Corpus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Ge Lor Pao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: On Habeas Corpus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?