California Association of Rural Health Clinics et al v. Maxwell-Jolly et al
Defendant:
David Maxwell-Jolly, Toby Douglas and California Department of Health Care Services
Plaintiff:
California Association of Rural Health Clinics and Avenal Community Health Center
Case Number:
2:2010cv00759
Filed:
March 30, 2010
Court:
California Eastern District Court
Office:
Sacramento Office
Referring Judge:
Edmund F. Brennan
0 Judge:
Frank C. Damrell
Presiding Judge:
Frank C. Damrell
Nature of Suit:
Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action:
28:2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| April 24, 2015 | 62 |
STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND ORDER dated *04/24/15* pursuant to order signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 04/23/15. (Benson, A)
|
| November 6, 2014 | 60 |
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/5/2014. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED because § 14131.10 impermissibly eliminates Federally Qualified Health Center and Rural Health Clinic services from coverage unde r the Medicaid Act. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit's ruling, the defendants and all those working in concert with them, are permanently enjoined from enforcing § 14131.10 with respect to "physicians' services" described in 42 U.S .C. §§ 1395x(aa)(1)(A) & (3)(A) and 1395x(r)(2)-(5) for which State Medicaid agencies are required to reimburse FQHCs and RHCs in manner described in 42 U.S.C. § 1396a(bb). Plaintiffs' 51 Motion for Attorneys' Fees is GRA NTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The requested fees as to Kathryn Doi, Regina Boyle, and Doug Cumming are hereby GRANTED. The requested fees as to Frank Fedor, John Fischer, Karen Kim, Asha Jennings, Jennifer Shih, and Rachel Schock are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Court would reconsider plaintiffs' Request should they file a new Motion accompanied by appropriate documentation so that the Court may consider reasonableness of requested fees. (Marciel, M)
|
| January 25, 2011 | 40 |
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/25/11 relating this case with member case No. CIV. S-10-3465 MCE KJN. (Kaminski, H)
|
| October 20, 2010 | 28 |
ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 10/20/10 ORDERING that plfs' 12 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; The motion is DENIED with respect to the issue of federal preemption; plfs have not shown that &# 167; 14131.10 conflicts with federal law mandates under the Medicaid Act. However, plfs' motion is granted with respect to their challenge to dfts' implementation of § 14131.10 without first receiving CMS approval of their proposed SPA . As to that issue, plfs are entitled: (1) to a declaration providing that dfts' implementation of § 14131.10 prior to receipt of federal approval of its SPA violates federal law; and (2) an injunction enjoining further implementation of § 14131.10 with respect to the subject adult dental, podiatry and chiropractic services until the State's SPA is approved by CMS. Clerk to close case. (Benson, A.)
|
| October 18, 2010 | 22 |
[WITHDRAWN PER MINUTE ORDER 24 ] MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 10/18/10: 12 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this file. (Kaminski, H) Modified on 10/18/2010 (Krueger, M).
|
| August 30, 2010 | 18 |
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 08/30/10. Motion Hearing re-set for 10/8/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. Opposition to motion due 09/22/10 reply to opposition due by 10/01/10. (Williams, D)
|
| July 23, 2010 | 14 |
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 7/22/2010 GRANTING 13 Stipulation and Proposed Order; Motion Hearing set for 9/24/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. RE 12 Motion for Summary Judgment; Defendants' last day to file opposition is 9/7/2010; and Plaintiffs' last day to file a reply is 9/17/2010.(Matson, R)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.