California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Contech Construction Products et al
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Defendant: Contech Construction Products, Inc. and Daniel Moody
Case Number: 2:2010cv00902
Filed: April 14, 2010
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 33 U.S.C. ยง 1319
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 17, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/16/2011 APPROVING Consent Agreement and DISMISSING plaintiff's claims with prejudice. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Agreement, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Notice of Violations)(Donati, J)
December 22, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/21/10, ORDERING that the dispositional documents disposing of the case be filed NO LATER THAN 2/35/11. All hearing dates heretofore set in this matter are hereby VACATED. (Kastilahn, A)
November 1, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 10/29/10 ORDERING that the Defendants may file their Answer or otherwise move with respect to Plaintiff's Complaint up to and including 12/15/10; the Status Conference is reset for 2/7/11 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. The parties shall file their status reports fourteen (14) days prior to the status conference. (Becknal, R)
August 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 8/27/2010 ORDERING that the time for Dfts to file an answer is EXTENDED up to and including 10/16/2010. The Status Conference set for 9/7/2010 is CONTINUED to 11/15/2010 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Zignago, K.)
June 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/11/10 ORDERING that the time for defendants to repond to Plaintiff's complaint is EXTENDED to 8/17/2010. The Status Conference currently set for 6/28/10 is CONTINUED to 9/8/2010 at 11:00 AM. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. Contech Construction Products et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: California Sportfishing Protection Alliance
Represented By: Andrew L. Packard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Contech Construction Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Moody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?