Dimitre v. AFSCME District Council 57 et al

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Eastern District Dimitre v. AFSCME District Council 57 et al

Dimitre v. AFSCME District Council 57 et al

Plaintiff:	Thomas Dimitre
Defendant:	AFSCME District Council 57
Case Number:	2:2010cv01194
Filed:	May 17, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Sacramento
Presiding Judge:	Frank C. Damrell
Nature of Suit:	Labor/Management Relations
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 185
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 9, 2010	Filing 35 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/8/10 RECOMMENDING that Deft's 27 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and Pltf's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. Objections due within 14 days of service. (Owen, K)
June 28, 2010	Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/25/10: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a first amended complaint is denied as unnecessary 13 . The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the proposed amended complaint 14 . The motion to dismiss is now moot and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to terminate the motion as a pending motion 8 . The July 1, 2010, hearing on the motion to dismiss is taken off calendar. (Kaminski, H)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 9, 2010

Filing 35 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/8/10 RECOMMENDING that Deft's 27 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and Pltf's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. Referred to Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. Objections due within 14 days of service. (Owen, K)

June 28, 2010

Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/25/10: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a first amended complaint is denied as unnecessary 13 . The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the proposed amended complaint 14 . The motion to dismiss is now moot and the Clerk of the Court is further directed to terminate the motion as a pending motion 8 . The July 1, 2010, hearing on the motion to dismiss is taken off calendar. (Kaminski, H)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dimitre v. AFSCME District Council 57 et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: AFSCME District Council 57
Represented By:	Andrew H. Baker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Dimitre
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?