Murphy, et al v. CTX Mortgage, et al
Plaintiff: Timothy Murphy and Julie Hendrix
Defendant: CTX Mortgage Company, LLC and Fortress Investment Group, LLC
Case Number: 2:2010cv01435
Filed: June 10, 2010
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Garland E. Burrell
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/10/2011 GRANTING 38 Stipulation to vacate Clerk's entry of default. The 37 Clerk's Entry of Default is VACATED. Dft CTX is ORDERED to file an answer within two days. (Zignago, K.)
February 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 2/17/11 ORDERING plaintiffs' claims against Fortress are dismissed with prejudice, and Fortress is dismissed as a party in this action. (Matson, R)
January 10, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 01/10/11. Status Conference re-set for 3/14/2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GEB) before Judge Garland E. Burrell Jr. (Williams, D)
December 16, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/15/2010 ORDERING 12 13 Motion to Dismiss are DENIED as moot. (Matson, R)
December 10, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 12/10/10 GRANTING 23 Motion for Leave to File a Second Amended Complaint; due within 5 days. (Manzer, C)
July 21, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 7/20/10, GRANTING 7 dft Fortress Investment Group's motion to dismiss, and DENYING AS MOOT dft's alternative motions for a more definite statement and to strike pltfs' request for attorneys' fees. Plaintiffs are GRANTED 14 days from the date on which this order is filed to file a First Amended Complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Murphy, et al v. CTX Mortgage, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Timothy Murphy
Represented By: Charles T. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julie Hendrix
Represented By: Charles T. Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CTX Mortgage Company, LLC
Represented By: Cris A Klingerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Fortress Investment Group, LLC
Represented By: Jonathan D. Fink
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?