Vaught v. Sandoval et al
Elbert Lee Vaught, IV |
E. Sandoval, D. Davey, T. Frohib, H. McKenzie, M. Wright, R. L. Glower, D. Van Leer, L. Choquette, L. Villanueva, R. St. Andre, R. Casaurang and N. Grannis |
2:2010cv01558 |
June 21, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Lassen |
Kendall J. Newman |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER adopting in full 38 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/7/11. Defendant's 32 motion to dismiss and to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status is DENIED. (Kastilahn, A) |
Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/26/11 GRANTING 45 Motion to vacate the dispositive motion deadline; The 8/5/11 dispositive motion deadline is VACATED. (Dillon, M) |
Filing 42 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/06/11 recommending that defendant's motion to dismiss for failure to exhaust administrative remedies 39 be granted. Motion to dismiss 39 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 21 days. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 38 ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/29/2011 ORDERING that pltf's 37 motion for an extension of time is DENIED; the clerk to assign a district judge to this action; and RECOMMENDING that dft's 32 motion to dismiss and to revoke pltf's ifp status be denied. Assigned and Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due w/in 21 days. |
Filing 35 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/16/2011. Within 30 days of date for this Order, plaintiff shall file an Opposition, if any, to defendant's 54 Motion to Revoke his In Forma Pauperis status. (Marciel, M) |
Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/24/2011 DENYING pltf's 29 motion to strike. (Yin, K) |
Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/12/2011 ORDERING that 22 23 requests for entry of default are DENIED without prejudice.(Duong, D) |
Filing 21 ORDER denying 20 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/7/2010. (Matson, R) |
Filing 12 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Elbert Lee Vaught, IV signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/5/10. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit on Director of CDC. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 9 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/20/10 denying 7 Motion to Proceed IFP. Plaintiff shall submit within 30 days from the date of this order, a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint and the certification required on the application form. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/28/10 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application toProceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.