Salazar v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Edgar Salazar
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 2:2010cv01686
Filed: June 30, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: Supplemental Security Income
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 416
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/5/12; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 20) is granted; Defendants cross-motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 23) is denied; The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g); Judgment is entered for the plaintiff; and The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. CASE CLOSED.(Matson, R)
June 6, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 6/4/11 ORDERING defendant's response to 20 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT extended to 7/6/2011. (Meuleman, A)
May 4, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 5/3/11 ORDERING that plaintiff's time to file his summary judgment motion is extended to 5/5/11. (Donati, J)
March 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 17 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 3/23/2011 ORDERING that Pltf's time to file his summary judgment is EXTENDED to 4/22/2011. (Zignago, K.)
February 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/9/2011 ORDERING 14 that the Plaintiff's time to file his summary judgment is hereby EXTENDED to 3/22/2011. (Reader, L)
August 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 8/3/10 ORDERING that Plaintiff's REQUEST to proceed in forma puaperis 2 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to serve the Scheduling order in social security cases. The Clerk is further direc ted to serve a copy of this order on the USM. Within fifteen days from the date of this order, Plaintiff shall submit to the USM an original and five copies of the completed summons, five copies of the complaint, five copies of the scheduling order a nd a completed USM-285 form and shall file a statement with the Court that said documents have been submitted to the USM. The USM is directed to serve all process without prapayment of costs not latern than sixty days from the date of this order. (cc: USM) (Mena-Sanchez, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Salazar v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edgar Salazar
Represented By: Bess M. Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?