Lacey v. Hamkar et al
| Jason Lacey |
| B. Hamkar, J. Ma and - Sweeny |
| 2:2010cv01695 |
| July 1, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 02/07/14 granting 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 Motion for Summary Judgment. The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment and close the file. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M) Modified on 2/7/2014 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing
46
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/5/2013 RECOMMENDING that defendants' 18 motion for summary judgment be granted. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within 14 days.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 8/7/12 ORDERING 37 Motion for Reconsideration is denied; The Magistrate Judge's February 24, 2012, order is affirmed; and No further motions for reconsideration of this order will be considered. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 04/10/12 ordering that pending before the court is plaintiff's motion for reconsideration 37 and 39 of the court's 02/24/12 order. Plaintiff noticed the motion for hearing before th e undersigned on 05/23/12. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 303(c) and (e), the hearing is vacated and the motion will be referred directly to the District Judge assigned to this case following the date for filing opposition. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 02/23/12 denying 27 Motion to Amend the Complaint. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 2/15/2012 ORDERING that defendants' 30 motion for reconsideration is GRANTED; the 1/18/2012 order is VACATED; the 1/18/2012 first amended complaint is STRICKEN pending further order on plaintiff's motion for leave to amend; and the 27 motion to amend hearing is SET for 2/23/2012 at 10:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/17/12 granting 27 Motion to Amend the Complaint. The clerk of the court shall file the proposed amended complaint submitted with plaintiff's motion. The clerk of the court shall terminate defendants' motion for summary judgment 18 as a pending motion. Defendant shall file a response to the amended complaint within 45 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Jason Lacey signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/3/2010. CDC is to collect an initial partial filing fee, if assessed in accompanying ifp order, and then after monthly payments and fwd to the clerk until the $350 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of pltf's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial w/ a copy of this order. (cc: CDC, Financial)(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/3/2010 ORDERING pltf to submit, w/in 30 days, a complete ifp application, w/ the required certified trust acct statement, or the appropriate filing fee; and the clerk to send pltf a new ifp form.(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
