Williams v. Bal
| Lonnie Williams |
| Bal |
| 2:2010cv01697 |
| July 1, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Gregory G. Hollows |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/16/11 ORDERING that plaintiff is informed that the 16 findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case. Within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/10/11 ORDERING pltf's motion to disqualify 15 is DENIED; a district judge is to be assigned to this case; IT IS RECOMMENDED that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failing to follow court orders and failing to exhaust administrative remedies. (Carlos, K)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/27/10 denying 13 Motion to disqualify the undersigned. Plaintiff must still respond to the court's order to show cause. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/10/2010 ORDERING pltf to SHOW CAUSE w/in 14 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 9/17/10 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 20 days from the date of this order, a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis including the certification required on the applicati on form. Plaintiffs failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 7/27/10 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within 28 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and plaintiff shall submit, within 28 days from the date of this order, a certified copy of his prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Bal | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lonnie Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bal | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
