Carr, Jr. v. Swarthout

Carr, Jr. v. Swarthout

Petitioner:	Charles H Carr, Jr.
Respondent:	Gary Swarthout
Case Number:	2:2010cv01779
Filed:	July 9, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office:	Sacramento Office
County:	Solano
Presiding Judge:	Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 2, 2011	Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/01/11 ordering petitioner's motion to lift the stay in this action, and to dismiss this action 14 is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). (Plummer, M) Modified on 12/2/2011 (Plummer, M).
November 8, 2010	Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/8/2010 ORDERING that respondent's 12 request for a stay is GRANTED, this action is STAYED pending a final appellate decision (cases noted in this order); respondent to notify this court w/in 30 days after the Ninth Circuit issues a remittitur in the noted related cases, and at such time inform the court whether the instant action has been redered moot or whether respondent seeks a continuation of the stay pending further appeals; the clerk to administratively close this case. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 2, 2011

Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/01/11 ordering petitioner's motion to lift the stay in this action, and to dismiss this action 14 is granted. This action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). (Plummer, M) Modified on 12/2/2011 (Plummer, M).

November 8, 2010

Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/8/2010 ORDERING that respondent's 12 request for a stay is GRANTED, this action is STAYED pending a final appellate decision (cases noted in this order); respondent to notify this court w/in 30 days after the Ninth Circuit issues a remittitur in the noted related cases, and at such time inform the court whether the instant action has been redered moot or whether respondent seeks a continuation of the stay pending further appeals; the clerk to administratively close this case. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carr, Jr. v. Swarthout
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles H Carr, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Gary Swarthout
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?