Wichelman et al v. Santa Clara County California et al
| Karl Wichelman and Anne Sabetta |
| Santa Clara County California, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, William Jensen, Vibha Mohindra, Alan Namath, Miguel Sanchez, Alfonso Banuelos, Jr., John Morton, Lawrence Crapo, Young S. Kang, Alexander Chyorny, Ross McMahon, Susan Murphy, Liz Kniss, Ann Ravel and David Gotham |
| 2:2010cv02125 |
| August 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Frank C. Damrell |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/01/11 ORDERING that the 7 Motion for Extension of Time is GRANTED; plfs' Objections to the 6 F&Rs are due w/i 30 days. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/9/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff Karl Wichelman's 8/9/10 application to proceed in forma pauperis 3 is granted; and Plaintiff Anne Sabetta's 8/12/10 applica tion to proceed in forma pauperis 4 is granted; and RECOMMENDING that Plaintiffs' complaint 1 be dismissed without prejudice to refiling this action in the appropriate venue; and this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
