Beste v. Judgment Enforecement USA, Inc.
| Paul Den Beste |
| Judgment Enforecement USA, Inc. |
| 2:2010cv02334 |
| August 30, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sonoma |
| John A. Mendez |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/17/12 RECOMMENDING that this case be dismissed without prejudice to the Chapter 7 trustee pursuing plaintiff's claim in the bankruptcy case. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/6/12 ORDERING that the court's OSC filed on 4/10/2012, is discharged as to plaintiff. On or before 8/3/2012, trustee Jeffry Locke shall respond to this order. The Clerk is directed to mail this order to Jeffry Locke and his counsel Johnson C.W. Lee. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/9/2012. Plaintiff shall SHOW CAUSE, no later than 4/27/2012, why this case should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to comply with Court's 20 Order. Failure to file required writing shall constitute ground for involuntary dismissal. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/25/11 ORDERING that plf shall promptly notify the Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustee, Jeffry Locke, of this action and serve a copy of this order on Mr. Locke; and, w/i 7 days of plf's compliance with this order, plf shall file a written notice with the court confirming such compliance. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER denying without prejudice 15 Motion for Default Judgment signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/6/2011. (Waggoner, D)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/29/11 ORDERING that The 9 OSC entered on March 4, 2011, is discharged. Plaintiff's 11 Request to Enter Default Judgment is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff shall show cause in writing, on or before April 15, 2011, why he has standing to pursue the claim against defendant, which plaintiff concedes is part of the bankruptcy estate.(Duong, D)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/04/11 ORDERING that plf shall SHOW CAUSE by 03/17/11 why he failed to file a status report in advance of the and failed to appear at the 03/03/11 Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference. (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Beste v. Judgment Enforecement USA, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Paul Den Beste | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Judgment Enforecement USA, Inc. | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
