Proffitt v. United States District Court Eastern District et al
Plaintiff: Jerry Daniel Proffitt
Defendant: United States District Court Eastern District, Drozd and Hollows
Case Number: 2:2010cv02352
Filed: September 1, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Gregory G. Hollows
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/13/11 ORDERING that, pursuant to the Ninth Circuit's referral notice, filed on May 12, 2011 (docket # 21), plaintiffs in forma pauperis status is revoked on appeal. (Meuleman, A)
February 3, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 2/3/2011 ORDERING that pltf's 12 second motion for an extension of time is DENIED; and the clerk is directed to DISREGARD any further requests for extension of time from pltf. (Yin, K)
December 8, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 12/7/10 ORDERING that 8 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED; Plaintiff is obligated to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action, to be collecte d and paid in accordance with this courts order to the Director of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation filed concurrently herewith. It is RECOMMENDED that this complaint be summarily dismissed with prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
October 4, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/4/10 ORDERING that plaintiff shall submit, within twenty-eight days from the date of this order, an affidavit in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided by the Clerk of Court, or the appropriate filing fee; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Proffitt v. United States District Court Eastern District et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jerry Daniel Proffitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States District Court Eastern District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Drozd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hollows
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?