Smith v. CMF SP Mental Evaluation Division et al
| Kenneth A. Smith |
| CMF SP Mental Evaluation Division and CMF Mental Health Evaluators |
| 2:2010cv02541 |
| September 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 1/20/2011 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED w/out prejudice for lack of prosecution and failure to comply w/ court rules and orders; all pending motions are DENIED as moot; and the clerk to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/8/10 ORDERING that plaintiff shall show cause in writing, within 30 days of the date of this order, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to file an amended complaint.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/26/10 ORDERING that plf's 1 Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint is DISMISSED w/ leave to amend; plf shall file an amended complaint w/i 30 days. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER 2 Motion to Proceed IFP signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/30/2010. (Matson, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
