Shroyer v. The HSBC - North America (U.S.) Flixible Beneifts Plan et al
| Jennifer Shroyer |
| The HSBC - North America (U.S.) Flexible Benefits Plan and BlueCross BlueShield of Illinois |
| 2:2010cv03079 |
| November 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Lawrence K. Karlton |
| Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 8/10/11 GRANTING 22 Request for Dismissal. This action is dismissed with prejudice and the Clerk is directed to close the case. CASE CLOSED.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/17/2011 ORDERING that dispositional documents are to be filed within 45 days. All pending dates are VACATED. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 01/11/11 ORDERING the time within which Defendants may respond to the Complaint is extended by one week, to and including January 18, 2011; the time parties may file Status Reports is extended from January 14, 2010 to and including January 19, 2011. (Williams, D)
|
|
Filing
9
STIPULATION and ORDER 8 for enlargement of time signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 12/21/2010. Defendants have up to and including 1/11/2011 to respond to Complaint. (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
