Taylor v. Monroe Detention Center et al
| Robert A. Taylor |
| Monroe Detention Center and E.G. Prieto |
| 2:2011cv00460 |
| February 18, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John F. Moulds |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 5/13/11 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign this action to a United States District Judge; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 3/25/11 ORDERING that the Sheriff of Yolo County shall collect from Plaintiff's prison trust account an initial partial filing fee and shall forward the amounty to the Clerk of Court. Thereafter , the Sherif of Yolo County shall collect monthy payments and forward them to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee for this action has been paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of Plaintiff's signed in forma pauperis affidavit on Sheriff of Yolo County, attention: Inmate Trust Account, 41793 Gibson Road, Woodland, CA 95776. The Clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the Court. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
