Adams v. Easley et al
| Tyrone L Adams |
| Charles L Easley, Andrew J Paulson, CGLS Inc., Francine Long, Myers Family Trust, Christine K Myers, Donald Myers, Pensco Trust Company, Paul Supre, George Trefcer, Thelma A. Turner Living Trust, Thelma A Turner, Barnes Family Trust, Caroline H Barnes, Dale M Barnes, Jack Bass & Charlene Goodrich Revoc Trust, Jack Bass, Amy M Bates, Cianciolo Revoc Trust, Sharon L Cianciolo, Charlene Goodrich, Gary Holbrook, Sutter County Board of Supervisors, Sutter County Department of Community Services, Sutter County Department of Community Services Building Inspection Division, Robert Boyer, Boyers Building Inspection Staff and Subordinants, Homepointe Property Management Company, Robert Machado, Ann Fisher, Eileen Stearman, Don Felton, Culligan Water Company Sacramento and John Judson Waggoman |
| 2:2011cv00826 |
| March 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Yolo |
| Dale A. Drozd |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343 Violation of Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
164
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/9/15 re: 163 Request for Immediate Return of All Filed Exhibits, Photographs, High Definition Color Photographs, All High Definition Audio - Video DVDs in the Court[']s Possession: The Court is not obligated to look at each Court filing to determine whether, when, and what Plaintiff seeks returned has been filed. However, since it appears that what Plaintiff seeks are referenced in court filings numbered 94 and 96 , the Clerk of the Court shall return to Plaintiff what is referenced in those filings. (Meuleman, A) Modified on 1/9/2015 (Meuleman, A).
|
|
Filing
160
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/9/12 denying 150 Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff may not file any further reconsideration motions in the district court. (Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
149
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 05/29/12 ORDERING that plaintiff's 128 , 129 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 Motions are STRICKEN; plaintiff's 126 Motion for Reconsideration is DENIED. (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/7/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff's renewed MOTION for Reconsideration, Amended MOTION for Reconsideration and MOTION and AMENDED MOTION for leave to file third amended complaint 104 , 106 , 111 , 112 , 117 are DENIED. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that the MOTIONS to DISMISS 60 69 be granted; and this Action be closed. These Findings and Recommendations are submitted to U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections to these F&R due within fourteen days. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
102
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 1/26/2012 DENYING 93 Plaintiff's Request for Reconsideration. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 1/5/12; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The findings and recommendations filed December 6, 2011, are adopted in full; and this action is dismissed as to the non-appearing defendants.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/4/2012 ORDERING that the motions filed December 30, 2011 (dkt. nos. 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 ) are DENIED. Plaintiff's future filings are hereafter limited. Plaintiff may only file the follow ing documents: One opposition to any motion filed by defendants (and clearly titled as such); Only one motion pending at any time. Such motion must be properly noticed for hearing. Plaintiff is limited to one memorandum of points and authorities in s upport of the motion and one reply to any opposition; and one set of objections to any findings and recommendations. Failure to comply with this order shall result in improperly filed documents being stricken from the record and may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/6/11: ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed October 4, 2011 42 are vacated as to defendants Easley, Goodrich, Bass, Homepointe Property Manage ment, Fisher, Machado, Stearman, Pensco, Inc., Radich, Weaver, Trefcer, Rodriques and Anderson. RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed as to the nonappearing defendants. F&R referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
42
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, recommending that action be dismissed, signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 10/4/2011. These F/Rs are referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Within 14 days after being with these F/Rs, any party may file written Objections with Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/1/11: ORDERING that 23 Motion for Extension of time is granted in part and denied in part. RECOMMENDING that 21 , 22 Motions to Dismiss be granted. F&R are submitted to District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/3/11 VACATING hearing date of 7/8/11 and DENYING without prejudice 16 Motion to Dismiss. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 5/25/11 ORDERING that Defendant's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction 10 is granted with leave to amend; Plaintiff is granted 30 days from the date of service of this order to file an amended complaint. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER SETTING STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 3/29/2011. Status Conference set for 7/15/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD). (Marciel, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
