Shany Co., Ltd. v. Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc.
Plaintiff: Shany Co., Ltd.
Defendant: Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2011cv01112
Filed: April 25, 2011
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Edmund F. Brennan
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/23/2015 GRANTING 58 Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award and GRANTING-IN-PART and DENYING-IN-PART 55 Motion for Attorneys' Fees. Crain is AWARDED attorneys' fees in the amount of $148,058.50. Judgment is entered in favor of Crain. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
October 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 74 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 10/30/2014 ORDERING that the plaintiff is precluded from opposing the defendant's motion to confirm arbitration award and motion for attorneys' fee. Plaintiff is SANCTIONED $500, to be paid within 14 days of the issuance of this order. The defendants' motion to confirm the arbitration award and for attorneys' fees remain pending under submission. (Donati, J)
August 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/7/2014 ORDERING that within fourteen days from the date of this order, plaintiff, through counsel, shall SHOW CAUSE why the court should not preclude plaintiff from opposing defendant' ;s petition to confirm arbitration award and motion for attorneys' fees and impose monetary sanctions. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to respond to this order to show cause will result in sanctions at the court's discretion and may include, without limitation, those discussed herein and dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41 (b) for failure to prosecute. (Zignago, K.)
July 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 67 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 7/10/14 ORDERING Plaintiff to show cause, through counsel, within fourteen days of the filing of this order why they failed to comply with the previous order and why sanctions should not be imposed. Sanctions could include monetary penalties and preclusion from opposing any re-noticed motions.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
June 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/3/2014 ORDERING that the 62 motion to withdraw as counsel of record for plaintiff is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to engage new counsel of record within thirty days of the filing of this order. Fail ure to do so will result in an order to show cause. Defendant's 55 , 58 motions to confirm arbitration award and to award attorneys fees are DENIED without prejudice. Defendant is directed to renotice the motions upon the close of the thirty-day period. (Zignago, K.)
June 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 05/31/12 DENYING 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. (Benson, A.)
September 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/15/11 ORDERING that the date by which Defendant Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc. must file its response to the First Amended Complaint, currently due on 9/19/11, shall be EXTENDED by twenty-one (21) days to 10/10/2011. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
August 12, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/11/2011 ORDERING that Status Conference is CONTINUED to 9/28/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties shall have until September 9, 2011 to meet and confer in compliance with FRCP Rule 26 and Local Rule 240(b). The parties shall file their Joint Status Report on or before September 21, 2011. (Duong, D)
August 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/4/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff Shany Co., Ltd ("Shany") shall have leave to file its First Amended Complaint; Shany's First Amended Complaint shall be deemed filed and served as of the date of entry of this Order; and Defendant Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc. shall have 45 days from the date of entry of this Order to file and serve its response to Shany's First Amended Complaint. (Becknal, R)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shany Co., Ltd. v. Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shany Co., Ltd.
Represented By: Bryan King Sheldon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crain Walnut Shelling, Inc.
Represented By: Paul L. Warner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?