Patrick v. Fillon
Nicholas Patrick |
Alfonso Fillon |
2:2011cv01195 |
May 4, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
Monterey |
John A. Mendez |
Kendall J. Newman |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 MEMORANDUM DECISION signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 11/8/2013 ORDERING the Petition under 28:2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the Court DECLINES to issue a Certificate of Appealability. The Clerk of the Court is to enter judgment accordingly. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L) |
Filing 43 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/30/2013 ORDERING that petitioner's 42 request for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 32 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/04/12 granting 31 Motion to seal pages 1262-81 of the fifth volume of the clerk's transcript(petitioner's probation report). Accordinly the clerk of court is directed to seal the pertinent lodged document containing those pages. (Plummer, M) |
Filing 19 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/23/11 ORDERING that Petitioner shall, within thirty (30) days after service of this order, inform the Court in a written statement whether he wishes to a. Stay the current federal petition in i ts entirety, so that petitioner may seek to timely exhaust, in the state courts, his currently unexhausted claims OR b. Proceed now in federal court, by: i. Proceeding on the currently-filed petition, thereby forfeiting unexhausted Claim 12 and Claim 13 (to the extent it includes Claim 12); OR ii. Filing an amended federal habeas petition that contains only petitioner's exhausted claims. The Clerk is directed to again send Petitioner the form for filing a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 17 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/14/11 ORDERING that Alfonso Fillon, current warden of Salinas Valley State Prison, is substituted as respondent; 13 Motion to Dismiss is partially granted; Within 30 days from the date of this order, petitioner shall complete and return the appended Notice of Election form; Clerk of Court is directed to send petitioner the forms for filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.(Dillon, M) |
Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/18/2011 ORDERING ptnr to SHOW CAUSE, w/in 21 days, why his failure to oppose respondent's 8/30/11 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion. (Yin, K) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Patrick v. Fillon | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Nicholas Patrick | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Alfonso Fillon | |
Represented By: | Brook A. Bennigson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.