Bustos v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Robert V. Bustos |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 2:2011cv01953 |
| July 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/19/12 ORDERING that plaintiff's 22 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; the Commissioner's 23 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; Judgment is entered for the Commissioner. CASE CLOSED (Benson, A.)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/23/12 ORDERING that attorney Bess Brewer is sanctioned in the amount of $2,000.00 payable to the Clerk of Court within 45 days. (Manzer, C)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/25/12, ORDERING that the parties 16 stipulation is approved, and plaintiff have until 3/2/11, to file a motion for summary judgment or remand. The scheduling order in t his case is amended accordingly. On or before 2/10/12, plaintiff's counsel, Bess M. Brewer, shall show good cause in writing why she should not be sanctioned in an amount of $2,500. Ms. Brewer shall appear before the undersigned in regards to this order to show cause on February 23, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. Neither plaintiff nor defendant's counsel need appear at the 2/23/12 show cause hearing. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/10/11 ORDERING that Pltf's 4 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to serve the undersigned's scheduling order in Social Security cases. The Clerk is further directed to serve a copy of this order on the USM. Within 14 days Pltf shall submit service docs to the USM and file a statement with the court that said documents have been submitted. (cc: USM) (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/4/11 ORDERING that Plaintiff application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is denied without prejudice; w/i 21 days of this order, plaintiff shall submit either a completed application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis, or the appropriate filing fee. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that his application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied.(Becknal, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bustos v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robert V. Bustos | |
| Represented By: | Bess M. Brewer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
