Majstoric v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department et al
Plaintiff: Branko Majstoric
Defendant: Sacramento County Sheriff's Department and Tomen
Case Number: 2:2011cv02006
Filed: July 29, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 07/20/12 DISMISSING CASE pursuant to FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)
June 14, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/14/12 DENYING 25 Motion for subpoena. (Dillon, M)
May 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/10/2012 DENYING plaintiff's 23 , 24 motions "to oppose". (Yin, K)
February 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/10/2012 ORDERING 18 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. (Waggoner, D)
October 18, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/18/2011 ORDERING that pltf's 10 amended cmplt is DISMISSED; the clerk is to send pltf a form for filing a civil rights cmplt; pltf may choose (A) w/in 30 days, to complete and return the Notice of Amendment w/ the required documents, or (B) elect to proceed on the 1 original cmplt by indicating on the Notice of Amendment and provide the service documents identified in the 9/13/11 court order. (Yin, K)
September 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Branko Majstoric signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/12/11. (cc Financial)(Matson, R)
August 11, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/10/11 ORDERING that within 30 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the attached Notice of Submission and submit to the court a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Paup eris By a Prisoner; and a certified copy of plaintiffs prison trust account statement for the six month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner (Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Majstoric v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sacramento County Sheriff's Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tomen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Branko Majstoric
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?