Hundal v. Ochoa et al
| Kanwaljit Singh Hundal |
| J. Tim Ochoa and Matthew Cate |
| 2:2011cv02345 |
| September 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Riverside |
| John F. Moulds |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 1/16/2013 ORDERING 30 that petitioner's motion for reconsideration is DENIED; Should petitioner seek review of the merits of his claims, he is directed to initiate a separate suit. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/9/2012 ORDERING that the e 16 "First Amended Petition" is STRICKEN; the clerk is to file the 1/9/2012 petition as a new case; and within 10 days, petitioner is to submit the $5.00 filing fee for the new case or a motion to proceed ifp. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
20
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/6/2012 RECOMMENDING that respondent's 13 motion to dismiss be granted; a COA be denied; and the petition be denied without prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 9/19/11 DENYING without prejudice 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Dillon, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
