Arceo v. DVI, et al
Plaintiff: Anthony Arceo
Defendant: Socorro Salinas, Martinez, Peters, - Stockton, San Joaquin County Jail, M. Singh, R&R Staff, DVI, Gonzales and Coroncr Moore
Case Number: 2:2011cv02396
Filed: September 9, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: San Joaquin
Presiding Judge: Kendall J. Newman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 144 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 7/26/2022 ADOPTING in FULL 143 Findings and Recommendations. Plaintiff's 140 motion to cease trust account deductions is DENIED, and this matter remains CLOSED. (Reader, L)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 143 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/08/2022 RECOMMENDING that 140 Plaintiff's Motion be DENIED. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations. (Rodriguez, E)
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 141 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/13/2022 ORDERING counsel for defendant to respond to plaintiff's 140 motion within 21 days from the date of this order. (Yin, K)
June 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 134 ORDER AND WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/30/2021 ORDERING the custodian to produce Anthony Arceo #1728-5, by Zoom video conference from his place of confinement, before Magistrate J udge Kendall J. Newman, on 8/3/2021 at 9:00 a.m.; custodian is ordered to notify the court of any change in custody of this inmate and is ordered to provide the new custodian with a copy of this writ; and any difficulties connecting to the Zoom video conference shall immediately be reported to Courtroom Deputy Alexandra Waldrop. (cc: I.T. Dept., ADR)(Yin, K)
January 21, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 121 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/21/21 DENYING 118 Motion as premature and DENYING 119 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Defendant Savage shall file his pretrial statement within thirty days from the date of this order. The pret rial conference is set in this case for 4/19/21 before the Magistrate Judge to be conducted on the file only, without appearance by either party. The parties are ordered to file a Joint Notice of Trial Readiness not later than thirty days after the pretrial order becomes final. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff the form Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (Plummer, M)
August 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 8/17/2020 ADOPTING 106 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)
June 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 110 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/26/20 ORDERING that plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file to file his pretrial statement and objections to the pending findings and recommendations. (Plummer, M)
May 18, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 05/18/20 ORDERING defendants are relieved from filing a pretrial statement. The pretrial conference set for September 8, 2020, (on the papers) is VACATED. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 30 days. (Plummer, M)
January 7, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER and WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM ISSUED signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/07/20 ORDERING the Custodian to produce Anthony Arceo by video conference on 2/25/20 at 9:30 a.m. in courtroom 24 before Magistrate Judge Caroly n K. Delaney. Custodian is ordered to notify the court of any changes in custody and to provide new Custodian with a copy of this writ. The clerk of court shall serve a copy of this order and writ on the Custodian. (cc: CKD and I.T. Dept, Sacramento)(Plummer, M)
October 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/23/19 ORDERING no further orders regarding plaintiff's 10/17/19 letter will issue. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and plaintiffs October 17, 2019 letter 91 on the Sheriff of San Joaquin County, 7000 Michael Canlis Blvd., French Camp, CA, 95231.. (Plummer, M)
September 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/20/19 ORDERING that within thirty days from the date of this order, the parties shall file the attached notice, informing the court whether a settlement conference is appropriate, whether they waive disqualification for the undersigned to hold the settlement conference, or whether they choose to have the settlement conference held by a different judge. (Plummer, M)
September 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 88 ORDER ADOPTING 81 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 09/10/19. GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART 71 Motion for Summary Judgment as follows: Defendant Savage's motion for summary judgment is DENIED; the remaining defendants Surjick, Kong, Adams and McHugh are GRANTED summary judgment. Action is REMANDED to the assigned magistrate judge for further scheduling. (Benson, A.)
March 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 85 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/29/2019 GRANTING 84 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff granted 30 days from the date of this order to file objections to 81 Findings and Recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
January 29, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/29/19 STRIKING 79 plaintiff's unauthorized surreply. The undersigned declines to postpone or defer ruling on defendants' motion. Plaintiff's mo tion for the appointment of handwriting expert 78 is denied. Also, RECOMMENDING that defendants' motion for summary judgment 71 be granted in part and denied in part as follows: Defendant Savage's motion for summary judgment be denied . The remaining defendants Surjick, Kong, Adams and McHugh be granted summary judgment. This action be remanded to the undersigned for further scheduling. Motion for Summary Judgment 71 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
May 1, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 75 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/1/2018 GRANTING 74 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff granted 30 days from the date of this order in which to file an opposition to 71 Motion for Summary Judgment. (Henshaw, R)
July 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/24/2017 ADOPTING in FULL 61 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 52 Motion to Amend the Complaint. (Washington, S)
June 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/21/17 ORDERING plaintiff's motion for clarification 57 is partially granted. Plaintiff's motion for protective order 58 is partially granted. Th e court will entertain no further motions to amend; plaintiff must file new and unrelated claims in separate actions. The 1/26/17 scheduling order is amended as follows: The discovery deadline is continued to 9/25/17. The deadline for filing pretr ial motions, except motions to compel discovery, is continued to 12/15/17. In all other respects, the provisions of the scheduling order remain in effect. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion to amend 52 be denied. MOTION to AMEND 52 referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
January 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr., on 1/5/17 ORDERING that the 11/23/16, and 12/1/16 orders are amended. This action proceeds on plaintiff's retaliation claims against defendants Surjick, Kong, Adams and McHugh for their actions in February of 2012, and defendant Savage based on his actions in September 2012. Defendant Adams shall file a responsive pleading within 21 days from the date of this order. (Kastilahn, A)
December 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/01/16 partially granting 39 Motion to Strike. Paragraphs 5-8, 10-12, 16-20, 22-53, 62-67, 69, 71-73, 75-84, 86-96, 100 and 103 are stricken from plaintiffs third amended complaint 27 . Defendants Surjick, Kong, McHugh and Savage shall file a responsive pleading within twenty-one days from the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
November 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 11/22/16 ORDERING that plaintiff's 36 Motion to Amend the Judgment, construed as a Motion for Reconsideration, is GRANTED; upon reconsideration, the 31 05/05/16 Order is AFFIRMED; t his action proceeds on plaintiff's retaliation claims against defendants Surjick, Kong, and McHugh for their actions in February of 2012, and defendant Savage based on his actions in September of 2012. Plaintiff's remaining claims, including all claims against the remaining defendants, are DISMISSED without prejudice. (Benson, A)
May 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/6/2016 DENYING as moot plaintiff's 29 motion to stay. (Yin, K)
May 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by District Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 05/04/16 ordering the findings and recommendations filed 03/18/16 28 are adopted in full. This action proceeds on plaintiff's retaliation claims against defendants Surjick, Kong, Adams and McHugh for their actions in February of 2012 and defendant Savage base on his actions in September 2012. Plaintiff's remaining claims, including all claims against the remaining defendants are dismissed without prejudice.(Plummer, M)
March 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/17/16 ORDERING the clerk of the court is directed to assign a District Judge to this case. U.S. District Judge Morrison C. England Jr. is randomly assigned to this case. The allegations in the pleading are sufficient at least to state potentially cognizable claims against defendants Surjick, Kong, Adams, McHugh and Savage. With this order the clerk of the court shall provide plaintiff a blank summons, a copy of the pleading filed 5/20/15 27 , 5 USM-285 forms and instructions for service of process to be completed and returned within 30 days. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's claims against the remaining defendants be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England Jr. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
March 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/16/2015 ORDERING that the third and fourth amended complaints submitted by plaintiff's mother, Sylvia Arceo, are STRICKEN; plaintiff's second amended complaint is DISMISSED; plaintiff has 30 days to file a third amended complaint; and the Clerk shall serve a copy of this order on Sylvia Arceo.(Yin, K)
October 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/24/14 ORDERING that 19 motion for extension of time is GRANTED; Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file a second amended complaint.(Dillon, M)
August 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/21/14 ORDERING that plaintiffs amended complaint is dismissed, with leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within 30 days that is no more than 15 pages in length. The Clerk of Court is directed to send plaintiff one blank copy of the Civil Rights Complaint used by prisoners in this district.(Dillon, M)
April 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/3/14 ORDERING that Plaintiffs motions for a temporary restraining order (ECF Nos. 13 , 14 ), are denied as moot. Plaintiff shall file a notice of change of address on or before May 23, 2014. Should plaintiff timely file a notice of change of address, the court will then screen plaintiffs First Amended Complaint and supplement (ECF Nos. 11 , 12 ). Failure of plaintiff to file a notice of change of address by May 23, 2014, shall result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Clerk of Court shall serve a copy of this order on plaintiff at his address of record.(Dillon, M)
March 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 3/11/2014 ORDERING plaintiff, within 30 days, to provide the court with (a) plaintiff's current mailing address, (b) a statement whether plaintiff withdraws his motions for temporary restr aining order, OR an explanation how the matters raised in those motions are not now moot, (c) a statement whether plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action on the merits, and thus obtain the court's screening of plaintiff's First Amended Complaint; failure to timely respond to this order shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and Officials at the San Joaquin County Jail shall forward this order to plaintiff at his current address.(Yin, K)
May 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/16/12 ORDERING the Sheriff of San Joaquin County to collect and forward payment from the prison trust account of Anthony Arceo to the clerk until the balance of $350 is paid in full. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order and the plaintiff's IFP on the Director of the CDC. The clerk is directed to serve a copy of this order on the financial department of the court. (cc Financial)(Dillon, M)
September 19, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/16/11 ORDERING that 2 Motion to Proceed IFP is DISMISSED without prejudice; Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff a new Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis By a Prisoner; and Plaintiff shall submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.(Dillon, M)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arceo v. DVI, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anthony Arceo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Socorro Salinas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martinez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peters
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: - Stockton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Joaquin County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: M. Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R&R Staff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DVI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gonzales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Coroncr Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?