Gifford v. Siskiyou County Sheriff et al
Plaintiff: Roger Gifford
Defendant: Siskiyou County Sheriff, State of California Highway Patrol and Darrel Lemos
Case Number: 2:2011cv02484
Filed: September 19, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Siskiyou
Presiding Judge: Craig M. Kellison
Presiding Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 76 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/1/2017 ORDERING this matter DISMISSED with prejudice as to all defendants. Each party is to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)
September 7, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/6/2017 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 69 are ADOPTED to the extent consistent with this order; in particular, defendants' 14 motion to dismiss plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim base d on an allegedly unconstitutional search is DENIED; defendants' 50 motion to dismiss plaintiff's Fourth Amendment claim for the execution of an allegedly invalid search warrant is GRANTED with LEAVE to AMEND; and County defendants' 65 motion for sanctions is DENIED for reasons articulated in the F & R's; within 14 days of this order, plaintiff shall file any second amended complaint; this matter is REFERRED back to the magistrate judge for future proceedings, as provided by the local rules. (Reader, L)
June 23, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 69 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 6/23/16 RECOMMENDING that Defendants' motions to dismiss (Docs. 14 , 50 ) be granted; Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without leave to amend; Defendants motion for sanctions (Doc. 65 ) be denied; and the Clerk fo the Court be directed to close this case. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
September 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 62 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/2/15 GRANTING 56 Motion for Extension of time. The hearing on the pending 50 MOTION to DISMISS is CONTINUED to 10/21/2015 at 10:00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. (Meuleman, A)
August 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 55 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/12/15 GRANTING the 52 Motion for Extension of Time as to the pending motion to dismiss set for hearing on 8/19/15. The hearing as to the 50 Motion to Dismiss is reset for 9/9/2015 at 10 :00 AM in Redding (CMK) before Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison. Any opposition is to be filed pursuant to LR 230. To the extent that Plaintiff is also requesting additional time to file an opposition to the motion to dismiss previously submitted, that request is late and is DENIED as untimely. (Manzer, C)
April 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/13/15 ORDERING that the stay in this case is LIFTED. A Status Conference is SET for 5/28/2015 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The parties shall file a joint status report no later than 5/21/2015. (Kastilahn, A)
October 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/4/2012 ORDERING that the hearings on 14 and 17 motions scheduled for 10/9/2012, at 10:00 a.m. before the undersigned in Redding, California, are hereby taken off calendar and the matters submitted on the record and briefs without oral argument. (Zignago, K.)
August 24, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 8/23/12 ORDERING that this action is stayed pending resolution of the related parallel criminal proceedings in People of the State of California v. Roger James Gifford,Siskiyou County Superior Cou rt No. 10-1116. Plaintiff and the CHP Officer Defendants, who have specially appeared, shall file a Joint Status Report every sixty (days) after the entry of this Order, apprising the Court of the progress and/or resolution of the related parallel criminal proceedings. Case stayed.(Becknal, R)
May 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/2/2012 ORDERING that the Clerk of the Court shall issue a summons in a civil case, the undersigned's new case documents, and an order setting this matter for an initial scheduling conferenc e. The Clerk of the Court shall send plaintiff the summons, nine USM-285 forms, and a copy of the complaint. Within 15 days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete the summons by indicating the addresses of the named defendants and shal l submit to the United States Marshal at the address indicated below the following documents: The completed summons; One completed USM-285 form for each named defendant; Ten copies of the complaint; and Nine copies of the court's initial schedul ing conference order issued herewith. Within 20 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file a notice indicating that the documents described above have been submitted to the United States Marshal, or a notice that plaintiff intends to serve the summons and complaint without assistance from the United States Marshal. If plaintiff seeks the assistance of the United States Marshal, the United States Marshal is directed to serve all process without pre-payment of costs not later than 60 day s from the date of this order, such service of process to be completed by serving a copy of the summons, complaint, and initial scheduling conference order on the defendants at the addresses provided by plaintiff. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the United States Marshal at 501 "I" Street, Sacramento, CA, 95814. (Zignago, K.)
October 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 10/28/2011 DISMISSING 1 Complaint with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall file an Amended Complaint w/in 30 days of date of service of this Order. (Marciel, M)
September 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 9/21/2011 GRANTING 2 plaintiff's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Reader, L)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gifford v. Siskiyou County Sheriff et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roger Gifford
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Siskiyou County Sheriff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California Highway Patrol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Darrel Lemos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?