McArdle v. US Bank National Association et al
Michael B. McArdle |
American Home Mortgage Servicing, Inc., Power Default Services, Inc., US Bank National Association, American Broker's Conduit Corp, TSI Title and Escrow, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Services Inc. and Fidelity National Title Co. |
2:2011cv02768 |
October 20, 2011 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Sacramento Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Carolyn K. Delaney |
Garland E. Burrell |
Foreclosure |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/21/12; This action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b), based on plaintiff's failure to prosecute the action and to comply with court orde rs; and The Clerk of Court be directed to close this case. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (l). Within fourteen (14) days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Any reply to the objections shall be served and filed within seven (7) days after service of the objections.(Matson, R) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.