Martel v. United States of America
| Richard Martel |
| United States of America |
| 2:2011cv03040 |
| November 16, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Placer |
| Carolyn K. Delaney |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
17
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, recommending that defendant's 6 Motion to Dismiss be granted; action be dismissed; and case be closed, signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 4/27/2012. These F/Rs are SUBMITTED to District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.. Within 14 days after being served with these F/Rs, any party may file written Objectios with Court and serve a copy on all parties. (Marciel, M) Modified on 4/27/2012 (Owen, K).
|
|
Filing
15
NON-RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/16/12; On April 11, 2012, the United States filed a Notice of Related Case in the above-captioned actions. Because the earlier action, Martel v. Cadjew, 2:11-cv-00509-JAM-EFB (PS), is now closed and the assignment of the two actions to a single judge is not likely to effect a savings of judicial effort or other economies, the actions will not be reassigned, as contemplated by Local Rule 123. SO ORDERED.(Matson, R)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 3/15/12 ORDERING the hearing date of March 28, 2012 is vacated. Hearing on defendant's motion is continued to April 25, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom no. 26; Plaintiff is directed to file opposition, if any, to the motion, or a statement of non-opposition thereto, no later than April 4, 2012. Failure to file opposition and appear at hearing, or to file a statement of non-opposition, will be deemed a statement of non-opposition, and shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; Reply, if any, shall be filed no later than April 11, 2012.(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/17/11 DENYING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; plaintiff has made an inadequate showing of indigency; within twenty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall submit the appropriate filing fee. (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Martel v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Martel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
